Correlation does not equal causation. There are powerful societal factors in the US behind the levels of gun violence there - some of the places with the loosest restrictions also have firearm violence rates on par or lower than here (like Vermont). I reckon the personal freedoms enjoyed by US citizens are admirable, and not just in terms of the 2nd amendment.
Whilst I'm all for concealed carry and being allowed to defend yourself, I don't like the idea of unsecured firearms being kept in the home 'in case' of a home invasion - anecdotally there does not really seem to be that much of it. That said, IMO if you break into someone's house and get shot while doing so, that is completely on you. Open carry is a bit more contentious - many people would find it confronting to have someone's firearm visible, though I am under the impression that even in open carry states, any business can request you not take it onto their premises.
The gun laws here are ineffective at actually preventing crime or stopping unlicensed firearms - the recent senate commission report bears this out, despite the obvious agenda of Penny Wright. IMO NZ has a reasonably good balance - you still need to go through the motions to get your licence, but once you have done so you can go and buy firearms without having to go through the red tape process of a permit. It's borderline ridiculous here. The stats show that hardly any firearms are stolen from law abiding firearm owners. I do agree with the storage requirements though.
Along with what Vonfram88 said about pistols, the fact that you can have a pump rifle but not a pump shotgun, but you can have a lever shotgun, calibre restrictions (i.e. if someone has the thousands of dollars required to buy a .50BMG rifle, it's unlikely they are going to use it for shooting anything other than targets on a range), airsoft is completely banned etc.
Correlation does not equal causation. There are powerful societal factors in the US behind the levels of gun violence there - some of the places with the loosest restrictions also have firearm violence rates on par or lower than here (like Vermont). I reckon the personal freedoms enjoyed by US citizens are admirable, and not just in terms of the 2nd amendment.
Whilst I'm all for concealed carry and being allowed to defend yourself, I don't like the idea of unsecured firearms being kept in the home 'in case' of a home invasion - anecdotally there does not really seem to be that much of it. That said, IMO if you break into someone's house and get shot while doing so, that is completely on you. Open carry is a bit more contentious - many people would find it confronting to have someone's firearm visible, though I am under the impression that even in open carry states, any business can request you not take it onto their premises.
The gun laws here are ineffective at actually preventing crime or stopping unlicensed firearms - the recent senate commission report bears this out, despite the obvious agenda of Penny Wright. IMO NZ has a reasonably good balance - you still need to go through the motions to get your licence, but once you have done so you can go and buy firearms without having to go through the red tape process of a permit. It's borderline ridiculous here. The stats show that hardly any firearms are stolen from law abiding firearm owners. I do agree with the storage requirements though.
Along with what Vonfram88 said about pistols, the fact that you can have a pump rifle but not a pump shotgun, but you can have a lever shotgun, calibre restrictions (i.e. if someone has the thousands of dollars required to buy a .50BMG rifle, it's unlikely they are going to use it for shooting anything other than targets on a range), airsoft is completely banned etc.
Australia's firearms laws are designed to prevent mass shootings like the Hoddle St massacre and Port Arthur.
They are designed to outlaw firearms that put out a lot of bullets or shell at a rapid pace. A lot of shotguns got the chop, and all semi automatic and fully automatic rifles were destroyed because they were designed to kill people. Pistols were vortually unaffected. Hunting rifles were vortually unaffected because both won't kill the same number of people that a pump action shottie or a semi auto rifle can.
Port Arthur was a noteworthy mass murder with a large number of fatalities. The criminal was in possession of unlicensed firearms. That's the problem with criminals - they don't tend to worry much about the law so amending the law will not affect them.
The majority of firearms in the hands of criminals were never licensed to start with. Only a minor proportion of guns in criminal hands were stolen from law abiding firearms owners. Recently there was the Australia post - customs racket that brought in a load of compact semi automatic pistols of a specification that are not even allowed for civilian issue in Australia. The crims have those now.
So when crims misuse guns they aren't entitled to possess, the natural response seems to be to restrict the freedom of law abiding citizens. Makes perfect sense doesn't it? Before someone pipes in and claims it has reduced suicide rates, well it hasn't and people are still killing themselves by whatever means they have available.
civilians have never been allowed to possess fully automatic firearms; the reforms did nothing in that regard. Many quite innocuous self loading rifles were destroyed, they had been responsibly kept by law abiding citizens for decades prior.
Handguns were subject to significant restrictions after the Monash University shootings which were by no means in the league of mass murder. Revolvers must now have a minimum barrel length of 100mm and self loading pistols must have a minimum barrel length of 125mm. Magazine capacity is restricted to 10 rounds. Practical shooting matches may use calibres no greater than 38/357/9mm. None of this has any effect on criminals who are in possessions of illegal firearms.
Storage requirements are strict. There is no opportunity for a firearm to be stored with its ammunition readily accessible.
Some states still permit semi auto and pump action shotguns but barrel length restrictions apply and magazine capacity is limited to 5. One shell fired from the unlicensed illegal shotgun used in the Sydney siege may have caused death of a hostage, the other hostage was killed by round(s) fired from semi automatic firearms discharged by police.
yeah, and nobody has access to any drugs either, because thats illegal. look how good that works.
im lost for words, seriously...
you realise cocaine is illegal yet every club in every city has people coked up... as an example
edit: i think its corruption at its finest moment. pretend to prosecute, yet import and make bank off it behind the curtain.
exactly how much vermin is actually out here now we kill everything?
this isn't 1950's anymore, even then the so called vermin were "aboriginals"... you all disgust me! for real.
how about your the vermin!
exactly how much vermin is actually out here now we kill everything?
vonfram do you have a small dick? because honestly thats all i ever think when i read your posts.
I roll my eyes when people stereotype firearm owners, people that drive big vehicles, gymgoers etc as having an inferiority complex about their penis.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?