bozodos
Member
Correlation does not equal causation. There are powerful societal factors in the US behind the levels of gun violence there - some of the places with the loosest restrictions also have firearm violence rates on par or lower than here (like Vermont). I reckon the personal freedoms enjoyed by US citizens are admirable, and not just in terms of the 2nd amendment.
Whilst I'm all for concealed carry and being allowed to defend yourself, I don't like the idea of unsecured firearms being kept in the home 'in case' of a home invasion - anecdotally there does not really seem to be that much of it. That said, IMO if you break into someone's house and get shot while doing so, that is completely on you. Open carry is a bit more contentious - many people would find it confronting to have someone's firearm visible, though I am under the impression that even in open carry states, any business can request you not take it onto their premises.
The gun laws here are ineffective at actually preventing crime or stopping unlicensed firearms - the recent senate commission report bears this out, despite the obvious agenda of Penny Wright. IMO NZ has a reasonably good balance - you still need to go through the motions to get your licence, but once you have done so you can go and buy firearms without having to go through the red tape process of a permit. It's borderline ridiculous here. The stats show that hardly any firearms are stolen from law abiding firearm owners. I do agree with the storage requirements though.
Along with what Vonfram88 said about pistols, the fact that you can have a pump rifle but not a pump shotgun, but you can have a lever shotgun, calibre restrictions (i.e. if someone has the thousands of dollars required to buy a .50BMG rifle, it's unlikely they are going to use it for shooting anything other than targets on a range), airsoft is completely banned etc.
Whilst I'm all for concealed carry and being allowed to defend yourself, I don't like the idea of unsecured firearms being kept in the home 'in case' of a home invasion - anecdotally there does not really seem to be that much of it. That said, IMO if you break into someone's house and get shot while doing so, that is completely on you. Open carry is a bit more contentious - many people would find it confronting to have someone's firearm visible, though I am under the impression that even in open carry states, any business can request you not take it onto their premises.
The gun laws here are ineffective at actually preventing crime or stopping unlicensed firearms - the recent senate commission report bears this out, despite the obvious agenda of Penny Wright. IMO NZ has a reasonably good balance - you still need to go through the motions to get your licence, but once you have done so you can go and buy firearms without having to go through the red tape process of a permit. It's borderline ridiculous here. The stats show that hardly any firearms are stolen from law abiding firearm owners. I do agree with the storage requirements though.
Along with what Vonfram88 said about pistols, the fact that you can have a pump rifle but not a pump shotgun, but you can have a lever shotgun, calibre restrictions (i.e. if someone has the thousands of dollars required to buy a .50BMG rifle, it's unlikely they are going to use it for shooting anything other than targets on a range), airsoft is completely banned etc.