• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

Essendon FC investigated over supplements

watching 730 report, not good for essendon.

Hird definitely involved in experimenting in use of various peptides; certainly brings sport into disrepute.
 
It doesn't bring sport into disrepute at all because all sports are on something and always have been and always will be
 
Sorry, if AFL thinks he has brought sport into disrepute, he will be suspended.

AFL not really interested in theories about what every other sport supposedly takes.

Perception is everythng to a major sport.
 
Yes, but it was banned by WADA since 2004.

however, does not look good with what they were doing.

We will see, but will be surprised if someone does not get punished.

AFL boss hinted that few day ago when he predicted dark days ahead for bombers.
 
spartacus said:
Yes, but it was banned by WADA since 2004.

however, does not look good with what they were doing.

We will see, but will be surprised if someone does not get punished.

AFL boss hinted that few day ago when he predicted dark days ahead for bombers.
Click to expand...

Does not look good means nothing. If it wasn't banned at the time it wasn't banned.
 
Bazza20 said:
Does not look good means nothing. If it wasn't banned at the time it wasn't banned.
Click to expand...

Exactly to date it looks like nothing anyone was taking at the time was banned so its all a bullshit storm in a tea cup. So far the only credible slight against dank was that he administered a drug from a container labelled equine and only then after the supplier accidently sent it in a batch of human drugs and told him it was fine to use.

Hardly a hangable offence. I hope he makes a shitload of money in slander cases.

Also whoi gives a shit what Hird took as a coach, he wasn't playing, unless he was taking cognitive enhancers to make him coach better how was it performance enhancing.
 
I think you can be banned by AFL for bringing sport into disrepute.

They deserve to go for being cretans.

Regardless of whether are suspended by ASADA, there will be a few people getting the sack. You can count on that.
 
Last edited:
Brick said:
Exactly to date it looks like nothing anyone was taking at the time was banned so its all a bullshit storm in a tea cup. So far the only credible slight against dank was that he administered a drug from a container labelled equine and only then after the supplier accidently sent it in a batch of human drugs and told him it was fine to use.

Hardly a hangable offence. I hope he makes a shitload of money in slander cases.

Also whoi gives a shit what Hird took as a coach, he wasn't playing, unless he was taking cognitive enhancers to make him coach better how was it performance enhancing.
Click to expand...

I think dank must have been very clued up on the rules. So far he seems to have done stuff right up the the limit and starting to look dodgy but without ever actually breaking the rules.

I have no problem with that. That's what they are supposed to do, push the boundaries. If WADA or the afl doesn't like what he is doing make it banned then. It's pretty clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top