you clearly ignored this bit ""Louisiana was the only state with the most gun violence where firearm-related suicides accounted for less than half of all gun deaths. In fact, homicides accounted for roughly 51% of all gun deaths in the state. As a result, Louisiana had the highest gun-related homicide rate in the country, at 9.7 murders per 100,000 residents. L"
your response doesnt begin to explain what i asked.
and why are you a member of the NRA, are you an american living in aus??
So we have had the shootings, let's ban guns.
After today's events let's ban trucks?
Automatic trucks, manual trucks aren't as devastating
and fyi a knife is infinantly better in self deffence than a gun, so if it was truely about protecting yourself you would be more into knives, like i am.
You maybe right. You ever driven a Big Rig? Double clutching one is certainly a skill.
You know it's illegal to carry knives for self defence here right? That's also well and good for a fit young bloke, what about an old person, or a woman? I don't own a single firearm to defend myself, nor do I carry anything to do so.
So, are we allowed to have guns or not?
Yeah.
Planes too!
And Cars! Cars transport Terrorists to the scene of their shootings. And clothes! Clothes are used to conceal weapons. And bags!!!!
Good point Barry!
Not if you just do the 'big three'
You know it's illegal to carry knives for self defence here right? That's also well and good for a fit young bloke, what about an old person, or a woman? I don't own a single firearm to defend myself, nor do I carry anything to do so.
talk about bozo's logical fallacys coming from baza
Yes i know they are illigal unless valid reason. a gun isnt going to do shit for an old lady. just pointing out if this was all about protection you would be advocating for the carrying of knives not guns.
if me and you were in argument you with a pistol me with a knife, would be able to draw and fucking skin you alive before you could draw and shoot.
Too many variables to say. I'm no Jerry Miculek, but chances are if you'd brought a knife to a gunfight you'd be shot before you got close enough to use it.
It's well known that <21 feet knives are the superior self defence item.
I believe that self defence is an inherent human right and anyone who wants to should be allowed to carry a knife, mace etc. As it is you can't carry anything in Australia for self defence, it has to be sheer luck that you might have something on hand.
I also find it ironic that the same 'logic' is applied to lockout laws as gun control, yet people fail to see the link.
way to contradict yourself. knives are superior under 20 feet but in the scenario i said i would likely get shot? jees you talk crap mate.