Fadi
...
All good points raised brother, but please do not expect a logical reply to any one of them, since the comment that instigated my original question (with further questions followed by you and Dave), was illogical, unscientific, and unfounded to begin with. Just take it on the chin and move one; anything 45 minutes or less renders you well...., less than serious! How can you argue with that type of "logic"?!I am sorry but how do you come up with that? What is the time period where a trainer is serious and not? is 44mins not serious but 46 is?
Very strange comment - also when you include cardio and other non-weight related sessions - how do you figure these in?
If I do 45 mins of weights > hour of cardio - should I be doing 2 hours in total to be serious?
I guess your a man who likes scientific proof on facts people raise - could you provide any evidence advising that anyone training under 45 mins is not serious about training?
You do know a LARGE % of natural bodybuilders follow the max-ot/heavy duty approach to training where sessions last 30-45 mins on avg, what about guys like Mike Mentzer, DORIAN YATES, Skip La Cour - one of the best ever natural bodybuilders etc etc
Sometimes you are really out of your depth with comments and simply like to stir the pot....
Last edited: