I don't force myself to eat.
i use the force to eat.
Force or fork.
I don't force myself to eat.
i use the force to eat.
Force or fork.
Just read the lot, what a classic, calls everyone fat and asks for a challenge then refuses to post up photos…lol
I think he had some sort of mental melt down, and is probably in psych ward somewhere now heavily sedated
Lifts even do you???Eat well you do
someone hold Bazza back!!!
Regarding the milk issue, what Joe regularly talks about is the pasteurisation process. A lot of the nutrients, good bacteria and healthy fats are killed during this process, so you're left with something with very little nutritional benefit; basically a liquid full of dead bacteria.
Who ever is saying that pasteurization leaves a white liquid with little nutritional benefit is clearly on drugs or have no idea what they are talking about.
Seriously. Where the hell are you getting your information from. I would suggest don't believe anything more they say.
Firstly. Pasteurization is only heating the milk to about 70C for around 15 seconds. Of all the cooked foods you eat its a pretty safe bet this is the least cooked food you eat.
If pasteurization left milk with little nutritional benefit we would be riddled with deficiencies from cooking most of our food and guess what we aren't.
The other thing. We can test the losses of vitamins and minerals from pasteurization, it has been done and these losses are minimal. Some vitamins are even more available after pasteurization.
You don't want bacteria in your milk. That's the whole point of pasteurization.
Who ever is saying that pasteurization leaves a white liquid with little nutritional benefit is clearly on drugs or have no idea what they are talking about.
That assertion is debatable. As with any cooking process, pasteurization causes some chemical change, says Jennifer Nelson, a nutritionist with the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., although she says that nutrition researchers are still testing to see if nutrients, enzymes and other health-related components are significantly altered. Whatever the nutritional change, Nelson cautions, "Raw milk can carry pathogens that can cause illness and death." Certain high risk groups should never drink raw milk: infants, growing children, the elderly and people who are immune compromised because their immune systems may not be strong enough to fight off the pathogens often found in raw milk, she adds.
Given the number of disease outbreaks related to raw milk, one might expect the demand for raw milk to dry up. Not so—in fact, demand for raw milk has risen faster than cream in a milk bottle, commanding prices as high as $10 per gallon. Despite the warnings of public health officials, including the Web site Real Raw Milk Facts, raw milk has become a national cause célèbre, and dairymen who sell it have become local folk heroes.
It seems like some new technology might have come along by now, an alternative to HTST pasteurization, that would make milk safe without delivering what some people think is an inferior product with less taste and nutrition. Yet, few alternatives have emerged since the days of Pasteur, according to University of Minnesota (U.M.) associate professor of veterinary public health, Jeff Bender. Each of the available alternatives has a downside: For example, some believe that low-temperature pasteurization (also known as batch processing) yields a tastier product. This process heats the milk up to a minimum temperature of 62 degrees C where it remains for 30 minutes, thereby taking longer than standard HTST pasteurization.
Doing a bit of research here (Raw milk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) and here (Got E. coli? Raw Milk's Appeal Grows Despite Health Risks - Scientific American), it looks like it's still up for debate. I'm not pretending to know much about the topic, so I'm just going off listening to experts in the field and my own research.