S
in your recent thread which by the way I thought was extremely rude and disrespectful toward you
seriously some of you need to come to terms that not everyone will agree with you, it's okay you know to be different from one another, to say and do different things from yourself, you know
Someone has to stick up for the gay feministsLeft wing liberal swine
What happened here?
Four Corners did an episode on why young Muslim Men are becoming suicide bombers etc. They found that a lot of them are just lost 'disenfranchised' youth, not really hardcore Muslims until 'seduced' by the cult leaders.
Someone has to stick up for the gay feminists
Are queers different to gays?FYI the correct term is now LGBTIQQA.
Does anyone else find it strange that the term 'queer' is now included in this acronym? To me it has degrading connotations.
Are queers different to gays?
I got an an acronym right here for you
It's the thing these days, feminist social justice warriors spend their time thinking up new ones, They reckon there are at least six genders now, life was much simpler when there was just a dick and a snatch.I dunno man. Why do we need all these labels?
I have seen this before but thanks.
We are silent because everyone is too scared to speak up for being labeled a bigot, racist, extremist etc etc.
And I am not just speaking about islam related matters.
Everyone is so precious these days and gets butt hurt about anything and everything, people make a past time about being offended and butt hurt.
Everyone has an excuse for everything, he raped 10 women because his mummy did not hug him enough, he robbed shops as he had mental health issues, he shot a cop because he was in fear of his safety etc etc I just can't listen to it any more.
Losers (yes you've read it here and from me)...losers whoever they are will always be losers. In fact they don't need an excuse to be so, as they'll make their own excuses so as to justify their losers' mentalities. And yes, in this instance, I am referring to Muslims who are just as ignorant as the people they're accusing of suffering from ignorance, there's no two ways about it Mick. I will never label you by a particular label if I can not substantiate my claim with some hard evidence. Hence as Darko knows well, I've always sided with him whenever he lifts his hands up in frustration and says: "Islam is not a race people!" ... and I can not but agree with him. My objection to Ms. Pauline Hanson's comments regarding Islam was based on her ignorance of the subject. Everyone here knows me well enough to know that I always keep my mouth shut and ears wide open when it comes to a subject matter I lack some knowledge in. Even Powerlifting, a sport you won't see me talk about, but rather ask questions instead from the people here who know their stuff on the subject.We are silent because everyone is too scared to speak up for being labeled a bigot, racist, extremist etc etc.
I know you're not mate.And I am not just speaking about islam related matters.
Mick, my approach to your comment here, is that with every right or privilege there comes a duty and a responsibility. Hence, freedom of speech ought to also come and have its own responsibilities. Some people can really go to town abusing the hell out of such a beautiful thing as freedom of speech. Some people are not afforded such freedom as freedom of speech, yet others seem to seriously, arrogantly, and perhaps even ignorantly take it for granted. Our ANZAC: is there anyone on this forum who disrespects the sacrifices our ANZACs have died in order for us to live the way we do? To me, abusing freedom of speech by ignorantly blurting out hateful and inciteful words, shows not only total disrespect for our ANZACs (where every Aussie ought to show respect, Muslim or non-Muslim), but it also demonstrates that the speaker has fully abused the responsibilities that come with such a powerful tool as freedom of speech. So yes to using freedom of speech, and no to abusing it to serve a particular agenda.Everyone is so precious these days and gets butt hurt about anything and everything, people make a past time about being offended and butt hurt.
The psychoanalytic theory, fathered by Sigmund Freud, where he’d like to convince us that we are a product of our past, is not an analysis I fully accept Big Man. Some folks strive to use their past experiences as a tool for personal growth, whilst others would like to use/abuse it to justify their misdeeds/misfortune etc.….Everyone has an excuse for everything, he raped 10 women because his mummy did not hug him enough, he robbed shops as he had mental health issues, he shot a cop because he was in fear of his safety etc etc I just can't listen to it any more
It has been established by a western expert on the subject of terrorism, that suicide bombers claim to their action is always politically based/motivated and not religiously based. Israel is a case in point for example.Four Corners did an episode on why young Muslim Men are becoming suicide bombers etc. They found that a lot of them are just lost 'disenfranchised' youth, not really hardcore Muslims until 'seduced' by the cult leaders.
Not believing that humans have affected climate change is hardly extreme, even the very scientists that study it can't agree on it.
97% of what, every scientist on the planet?Not really true. They did a review of the research on global warming. Of something like 4000 research papers and 97% agreed with man made global warming.
97% of what, every scientist on the planet?
It's also not called global warming anymore and changed if to "climate change" because they can't even agree on what the effect actually is.
another interesting debate, but me think odds favour human impact with regard to global warming. that does not mean much will done about any related problem anytime soon.
97% of the 4000 research papers on man made climate change at the time of the review concluded that it is happening. I think the number is similar for consensus among climate scientists as well. It's not the big disagreement among scientists in the field that politicians like to claim.
Don't talk about scientists in general. Asking a scientist in another field about climate is like Big Mick talking about the reproductive anatomy of chickens.
I've had this argument with my dad. He doesn't believe in man made climate change. I asked him where is his peer reviewed paper or papers that disagrees with the thousands of papers that point towards man made climate change. Also how long has he studied climate science for. As suspected he didn't like that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?