In concept, weight training is a very simple practice. You lift weights, you wait a while, you do it again. You improve over time and eventually you are stronger and bigger than you were before. When you strip it down it's really quite simple isn't it? The problem is things don't always go as smoothly as the above description would imply.
The Size And Strength Relationship
In bodybuilding circles there is the common misconception that muscle mass increases and strength increases are not necessarily related. That is to say, that you can increase the size of a muscle without it getting stronger. This mistaken belief presents itself commonly in the old "Bodybuilders aren't as strong as Powerlifters" argument. If strength was related to muscle mass, wouldn't Powerlifters be bigger than Bodybuilders? The explanation is simple: Strong people usually have better mechanical advantages than weaker people. This includes more favorable joint lengths and connective tissue factors (including attachment placings and superior tendon and ligament strength). They may have more type II fibers than others and/or a more efficient nervous system (which can be trained for). A muscle can be trained to get stronger but not bigger - this depends on rep range, training voulme and frequency. However, if a muscle gets larger it must also get stronger in the rep range over which it was trained. Likewise, if a muscle gets stronger in a rep range conducive to producing growth then the muscle will also get larger. It is a scientifically verified physiological fact that muscle size and strength are directly related.
Let's take a look at what happens to a muscle when you train it. Taking a segment from the Neuromuscular System series on the 'Physiology Related Articles' page:
read more http://www.weightrainer.net/training/growth1.html
The Size And Strength Relationship
In bodybuilding circles there is the common misconception that muscle mass increases and strength increases are not necessarily related. That is to say, that you can increase the size of a muscle without it getting stronger. This mistaken belief presents itself commonly in the old "Bodybuilders aren't as strong as Powerlifters" argument. If strength was related to muscle mass, wouldn't Powerlifters be bigger than Bodybuilders? The explanation is simple: Strong people usually have better mechanical advantages than weaker people. This includes more favorable joint lengths and connective tissue factors (including attachment placings and superior tendon and ligament strength). They may have more type II fibers than others and/or a more efficient nervous system (which can be trained for). A muscle can be trained to get stronger but not bigger - this depends on rep range, training voulme and frequency. However, if a muscle gets larger it must also get stronger in the rep range over which it was trained. Likewise, if a muscle gets stronger in a rep range conducive to producing growth then the muscle will also get larger. It is a scientifically verified physiological fact that muscle size and strength are directly related.
Let's take a look at what happens to a muscle when you train it. Taking a segment from the Neuromuscular System series on the 'Physiology Related Articles' page:
- "Muscle biopsies of experienced bodybuilders have shown that it was the size of the individual fibers within their muscles that was responsible for the abnormal muscle size and not the actual number of fibers present."
read more http://www.weightrainer.net/training/growth1.html