Rambodian
No I'm not cambodian
Big bodies have been built using all methods.
Progression is key.
HIT is more to do with effacy than anything else.
The amount of time one works out versus how quick one recovers is personal.
Progression and consistency?
How do you measure your progression Andy?
One thing I have not researched with HIT is the rep ranges one would use, so I guess I am talking volume with HIT.
Is it just moderate intensity (measured by weight) until failure in one set? with moderately high reps, or just hitting failure on the last set and building up to it.
Or is it just going balls to the wall intensity, low volume, higher frequency to failure....which would probably be more efficient. makes me think that would lead to lower injury rates too.
What are your thoughts mate?
Am I confused on HIT to some degree, I think I may be.