Exactly right.It’s funny calories in vs calories while not 100% perfect works on farm animals extremely well.
Its harder to work on humans because humans tend to lie and it’s hard to tie humans up for years and do a controlled calories in vs out study.
Calories in vs out isn’t just pure physics without taking into biology. When you test the energy of feeds for farm animals you have to specify the animal because the feed value varies depending on the animals and how they digest the same feed. Humans is the same. The calories you see is estimated for humans, it’s not the total calorie content of that food.
There was this TV show that was doing nutrition myths. They got three people that claimed they all ate something like 1500 calories and couldn’t loose weight, calorie counting didn’t work for them. The show hired private investigators to follow them and track their eating. In reality they were actually eating something like double to triple the calories they claimed.
No i think it's been found that when caloric deficit is equal, the two methods provided similar results.
Ill need to go find it.
Also, the guy who ate nothing but maccas, and another guy who Ate nothing but mars bars. Kept to a caloric deficit. Both lost predictable amounts of weight.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
lmao wow this Dr. Fung guy literally believes that the secret to health is just starving yourself
I don’t know what this dr fung is claiming because I haven’t watched the video but there seems to be evidence coming out about health benefits from periods of fasting.
Exactly right.
Most people don't track correctly.
Simple mistakes like say counting rice.
Gotta be counted raw.... Not fucking cooked.
Cooking oils is another one that fucks people up.
And people using something like MyFitnessPal
lmao wow this Dr. Fung guy literally believes that the secret to health is just starving yourself
Yeah true, but I’ve still cut that way, didn’t list the oils and used MyFitnessPal for all counts, even said “fuk it, close enough“ and selected the closest thing to the food I was looking, estimated weight by eye and still lost fat.
it is so because when I measured what I was eating before cutting I measured just as incorrectly with same gaps and errors, so I was getting a cal reduction from previous diet and that was as scientific as I ever got and it still worked.
i don’t think you need to the microscopic level to lose some fat, well I don’t anyway, close enough worked well enough but keep in mind I didn’t have a set period to be stage ready or anything, in those circumstances you may want to a lot more precise.
Also didn’t measure fat levels either, mirror and how clothes fit was as precise as I got.
"cut" lol,youre still fat,fatty.
I unlike you am carrying muscle
you on the other hand are just an ugly looking fat fuk.
Yeah nah yeah that's fine.Yeah true, but I’ve still cut that way, didn’t list the oils and used MyFitnessPal for all counts, even said “fuk it, close enough“ and selected the closest thing to the food I was looking, estimated weight by eye and still lost fat.
it is so because when I measured what I was eating before cutting I measured just as incorrectly with same gaps and errors, so I was getting a cal reduction from previous diet and that was as scientific as I ever got and it still worked.
i don’t think you need to the microscopic level to lose some fat, well I don’t anyway, close enough worked well enough but keep in mind I didn’t have a set period to be stage ready or anything, in those circumstances you may want to a lot more precise.
Also didn’t measure fat levels either, mirror and how clothes fit was as precise as I got.
I unlike you am carrying muscle
you on the other hand are just an ugly looking fat fuk.
id out total you with ease fatboy,lets face facts,sure you may outbench me having done it for 20 years longer and being 20 kgs fatter but we ve been down this road havent we regarding squats and deadlifts,ya know the true test of overall body strength. Your chest and biceps are ornaments buddy. You dont impress me physically.
Kunce eat like that and still have six packs.
Makes me sick. [emoji46]
So you are saying that every lean person is starving themselves??
It's blatantly obvious that this is incorrect.
I have one mate in particular who literally lives of KFC, Red Roster, Pizza and Maccas, and drinks at least 2 cases of beer a week, I am serious that is all he eats breakfast lunch and dinner, he is 49 this July I have known him since we were 15 he has had a 6 pack the whole fucking time, eating this way since he was about 21, you can see striations in his muscles across his chest and his arms, it has killed my life the whole time.
Yet he has kidney stones, high blood pressure, and a myriad of other health issues his blood work is horrendous but mine in comparison is perfect with zero health issues ever.
I eat reasonable healthy, rarely drink, hardly ever eat take away like that, may be once a fortnight get a chicken burger from KFC, or some Chinese take away or sushi and have not seen my abs since I was 21.
I also train a lot more than he does and am a LOT more active than what he is day in and day out, I also lift way more than he does and way more often.
But his hormones work different to mine, if I ate his exact same diet I would weigh 200kg and probably already be 6 feet under. How do calories out vs calories in account for that??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?