Barry, what is the real point of difference here between you and JW? Is it the fact that he won't call the killer a terrorist, acting on behalf (or because of ) some influence by some terrorist Muslim group, or is it that he won't say that the act itself was a terror related act? I hope I haven't added fuel to the fire here, but I am curious as to where this whole argument between you two is going?
Argument isn't going anywhere now. It's over, Jw submitted a while back.