@
Grunta ; All I am saying is that it's a complicated problem of social disenfranchisement and radicalism,
No, it's not.
people in this thread who are reducing this incredibly complex social issue to a case of Muslims vs the western world
No they're not. The muslim terrorists groups are doing that. They have stated that very clearly on many occasions. It's "us and them" and it aint gonna be over until all of the "thems" are dead. And is this not exactly what ISIL are dong right now? Correct me if I am wrong (and apologies in advance if I am) but does not the Quaran/Koran say just that or something similar?
Unfortunately this thread has degraded into a virtual Islamaphobic mob rant, which admin and mods seem to be willing to allow regardless of the fact that it is obviously offensive to some members of this community. There are too many people getting swept up in the hysteria without critically analysing their information.
Well then, stop it.
In regards to your statement that religion is why, this is happening - religion is being used as an excuse by fundamental extremists. These people would likely be doing the same thing under another guise if they weren't Muslim.
Horse shit. The terrorist groups have made it abundantly clear that they are doing this all in the name of Islam. To suggest otherwise is wishful thinking, hypothetical and horsey poop.
It should be acknowledged that the people arrested and charged yesterday had links to Isis overseas and should not be referred to as members of the non-radicalised Muslim majority. They are representative of Isis radicals not Muslims perse.
OK. Good point, but what are the "silent majority" doing about it? In Sydney they all went out to protest a legitimate police action based on real threats, in effect claiming these radicals as there own. If I may be so bold as to offer a bit of hyperbole here: even among the Nazis there were "good" people, but at some stage, the good was overwhelmed by the actions of a few.
You might want to give this a poke:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism#Examples_of_organizations_and_acts
...reactionary behaviour will only give their cause perceived legitimacy and perpetuate the situation.
Nope. Condoning them by remaining the "silent majority" muslims will perpetuate the situation. Kicking up a fuss will polarise the situation and get it solved, as much as we are able.
I know every argument that the three pillars of idiocy will bring up after this post, nit-picking and once again making no contribution to the argument.
See, this is a problem. You are being mean and I am all tearing up cos you are calling people names, which is not nice, not constructive and indicative of a point of view that is contrary to all logic, common sense and decency. Maybe what you meant was that we should all just agree with you. Sorry. Not gonna happen.
My point is it is an issue which will take a multi-faceted approach to solve - social, economic and military and will take significant time to do so.
You are probably right. But condoning the actions of the radicals when the "other" muslims do not condemn them, loudly, clearly, internationally and forcefully does not help the situation at all, but perpetuates their actions, lionising them if you will.
To over simplify the situation is inherently risky and to post some of the crap that has been posted in this thread is irresponsible.
I totally agree with you. So stop it.