egoYeah OCTs would probably be the most effective form of testing. I would say all in competition testing would be a lot easier to pass especially if you were working with team doctors to make sure everyone was in line.
As you've mentioned the biggest thing with OCTs is good fair independent testing but even then corruption can come into play. But in sports like powerlifting why would anyone go to the trouble for a sport you can't even make money off of.
Dips, dips and more dips.
Question for you Stephen or Steven also:
My bench sucks balls, I lack the ability to grind but I also lack top end strength. I rep for 7 touch and go 87.5% of what I pause for 1. When I lift a max I have a real fucked up lift that starts fast, hits the sticking point and is a real grinder all the way to the finish. When I miss a lift it stays at the sticking point for maybe 4-5 seconds.
So I need to concentrate on my top end strength but I lack the ability to grind and need to smooth out my lift so it's a more constant speed, what is best for this? I was thinking paused sets of 3 up to a max and a few paused sets of 5 as down sets, does this sound like a logical choice? Breaking touch and go rep PBs got me very good at repping and a little increase in top end strength but not so much
Dips, dips and more dips.
It might sound difficult to administer, but if national records could only be set at national level competitions, and all entrants to the national level events had to submit for testing once per month for three months prior, I think the records would stand for a while longer.
Also, there should be automatic triggers for testing in competition. For instance if a novice graded lifter suddenly makes Elite grade in less than two years, there's some incredible natural talent there that needs to be validated with some targeted testing.
These are the hallmarks of a former endurance athlete. your strength curve will be difficult to reform if your formative years were as an endurance athlete.
If your strength endurance is good, maybe you should look to maximise that natural ability. The limit strength will follow and you will probably make greater gains to your limit strength this way rather than trying to re-form your strength curve.
Take a look at the old Tom Platz vs Hatfield squat contest. Hatfield only just pipped old thunder thighs on the limit strength, but who do you think was the more impressive lifter on that day?
You might want to try adding in assistace work around your lifts. Smash those triceps for example. Also try adding in some partial movements like floor presses, boards, rack presses. Some heavy DB work never goes astray as well.
Main lift + assistance
Thats what the doctor prescribes.
If I were you Id write a decent 6 week programming cycle with assistance and stick to it... then try your max effort, see if its worked. The only way to know if something has worked is to put a strict plan of attack in place... like science![]()
How many times a week are you benching currently? And what do you workouts look like for bench?
Thats your problem, you need skull crushers, rope pull downs, chins and dips. Your triceps and upper back are weak.
<in b4 you reference numerous studies proving me wrong>
Thats your problem, you need skull crushers, rope pull downs, chins and dips. Your triceps and upper back are weak.
<in b4 you reference numerous studies proving me wrong>
Dips, dips and more dips.
lol oni asking for help, when was the last time you did something that someone suggested?
for a length of time?
What I mean is that I don't think any of the top PA guys would use any kind of drug prohibited on the wada list. I have heard a few people say beating the system is easy and its pointless to test. My question is always- do you actually think anyone is trying to beat the system here and is it true that it is easy. If its so easy then why do top European lifters get rolled? Are they just stupid? Im inclined to think that they get caught when they get an unexpected test from an independent testing body. If I am right this highlights a different sort of issue. What ticks me off is the suggestion that Oz lifters are cheating or that is so easy to cheat that they are all in question.
When I say drug-free I mean that they not only pass the test, but also that they are not cheating by somehow beating the test. There isn't much point asking me about how you test for certain things as I do not have a scientific background or an intimate knowledge of drugs. What I can say is that top athletes in well resourced environments get caught and I get the impression the key issue is not that the tests can be beaten, but that testing regimes are less than perfect in some places. In competitions tests are useless. OCTs are effective- or at least they appear to be.
I would like to see a video. I'm inclined to say pin presses, bench with chain and bench against bands/reverse bands would be worth trying- depending on where things slow down. I know Mike T says these things can also be addressed by chnaging up the rep/set arrangement.
I've been hitting a lot of PBs on presses since I added dips to bench day.
I also added incline press which I think has helped. I was weak at both (still am)
I just did bodyweight dips after bench, I think I could only manage 6-7 at first at 110kg bodyweight. I've only been doing them a month or so.
My increase in strength recently though is probably due just as much to eating like a pig over october/nov/dec and gaining 10kg![]()
Dips would be a good addition then. Would probably put these on the intensity cycles as my dropset after benching. Do people think 8's are a good range here?