• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.
Its OK Johnnie. Don't get yer panties in a knot. Bazza has some sort of genetic problem that prevents logical thought. Just take a breath and pat him on the head. He's basically a good boy, just not sure how to play with others. And adults.

The NRA line is that everyone should have a gun to protect themselves (and, of course, "their loved ones") against some sort of vague aggressor who may be Russian, Chinese, black or generally "not like them". Shit like the Paris killings tend to make the lesser intelligent go along with that.

What the NRA never advertises is that the consequence of that "right" is the deaths of so may children from accidental shootings (or deliberate in some cases). Yes, the very "loved ones" that guns are supposed to protect.

e.g. http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...holas-kristof-gun-deaths-preschoolers-police/

=====
"In America, more preschoolers are shot dead each year (82 in 2013) than police officers are in the line of duty (27 in 2013), according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI," Kristof wrote in an Oct. 3, 2015 op-ed.


A reader asked us to see if that was accurate. We found that it was, and for more years than the one he cited. We also stress-tested his comparison by defining preschoolers more narrowly than he did and for the most part, the comparison still holds up.
======

Further, the NRA knowing that this is an issue (not to mention all the mass shootings of adults) decided to fix that "problem":

====
In the 1990s, politicians backed by the NRA attacked researchers for publishing data on firearm research. For good measure, they also went after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for funding the research. According to the NRA, such science is not “legitimate.” To make sure federal agencies got the message, Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ark.) sponsored an amendment that stripped $2.6 million from the CDC’s budget, the exact amount it had spent on firearms research the previous year.
=====

So, bottom line is that poor Bazza is just another victim of the NRA propaganda battle. After all, say something long enough and loud enough and eventually everyone will just agree or no longer protest. This is, after all, a good reason why slogans are used to promote radical ideas.
 
Its OK Johnnie. Don't get yer panties in a knot. Bazza has some sort of genetic problem that prevents logical thought. Just take a breath and pat him on the head. He's basically a good boy, just not sure how to play with others. And adults.

The NRA line is that everyone should have a gun to protect themselves (and, of course, "their loved ones") against some sort of vague aggressor who may be Russian, Chinese, black or generally "not like them". Shit like the Paris killings tend to make the lesser intelligent go along with that.

What the NRA never advertises is that the consequence of that "right" is the deaths of so may children from accidental shootings (or deliberate in some cases). Yes, the very "loved ones" that guns are supposed to protect.

e.g. http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...holas-kristof-gun-deaths-preschoolers-police/

=====
"In America, more preschoolers are shot dead each year (82 in 2013) than police officers are in the line of duty (27 in 2013), according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI," Kristof wrote in an Oct. 3, 2015 op-ed.


A reader asked us to see if that was accurate. We found that it was, and for more years than the one he cited. We also stress-tested his comparison by defining preschoolers more narrowly than he did and for the most part, the comparison still holds up.
======

Further, the NRA knowing that this is an issue (not to mention all the mass shootings of adults) decided to fix that "problem":

====
In the 1990s, politicians backed by the NRA attacked researchers for publishing data on firearm research. For good measure, they also went after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for funding the research. According to the NRA, such science is not “legitimate.” To make sure federal agencies got the message, Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ark.) sponsored an amendment that stripped $2.6 million from the CDC’s budget, the exact amount it had spent on firearms research the previous year.
=====

So, bottom line is that poor Bazza is just another victim of the NRA propaganda battle. After all, say something long enough and loud enough and eventually everyone will just agree or no longer protest. This is, after all, a good reason why slogans are used to promote radical ideas.


surely the solution is to arm the kids as well?
 
seriously think about it, i was at a school shooting as a kid.

do you not think that would cause a person to know slightly more than the average idiot about guns and their effects on society? Think how many people I have had debates with on this from both sides of the camp.

But sure, according do you im uneducated on the matter. despite your rationale being "the us seems a pretty good place"

Jesus, I assume you mean Dunblane?
 
Its OK Johnnie. Don't get yer panties in a knot. Bazza has some sort of genetic problem that prevents logical thought. Just take a breath and pat him on the head. He's basically a good boy, just not sure how to play with others. And adults.

The NRA line is that everyone should have a gun to protect themselves (and, of course, "their loved ones") against some sort of vague aggressor who may be Russian, Chinese, black or generally "not like them". Shit like the Paris killings tend to make the lesser intelligent go along with that.

What the NRA never advertises is that the consequence of that "right" is the deaths of so may children from accidental shootings (or deliberate in some cases). Yes, the very "loved ones" that guns are supposed to protect.

e.g. http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...holas-kristof-gun-deaths-preschoolers-police/

=====
"In America, more preschoolers are shot dead each year (82 in 2013) than police officers are in the line of duty (27 in 2013), according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI," Kristof wrote in an Oct. 3, 2015 op-ed.


A reader asked us to see if that was accurate. We found that it was, and for more years than the one he cited. We also stress-tested his comparison by defining preschoolers more narrowly than he did and for the most part, the comparison still holds up.
======

Further, the NRA knowing that this is an issue (not to mention all the mass shootings of adults) decided to fix that "problem":

====
In the 1990s, politicians backed by the NRA attacked researchers for publishing data on firearm research. For good measure, they also went after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for funding the research. According to the NRA, such science is not “legitimate.” To make sure federal agencies got the message, Rep. Jay Dickey (R-Ark.) sponsored an amendment that stripped $2.6 million from the CDC’s budget, the exact amount it had spent on firearms research the previous year.
=====

So, bottom line is that poor Bazza is just another victim of the NRA propaganda battle. After all, say something long enough and loud enough and eventually everyone will just agree or no longer protest. This is, after all, a good reason why slogans are used to promote radical ideas.

good to see the gang out in force now.


again you seemed to have missed the argument like the other bloke and just stating facts that no one is even disagreeing with.


My point is, is changing US gun laws actually going to make a difference. Now settle, think about it rather than just trying some poor insults towards me before you make a response. If so what do you suggest and why would it make a difference.
 
I don't know Bazza, It's just interesting that most shootings are where there are gun free zones.
There are good arguments both sides, but in hindsight if I was in the lindt shop and had a gun along with everyone else, the scumbag bastard would think twice about what it did.

It's like when you are having a stupid conversation where the bloke makes no sense, you smack him in the face, it might not change the way he thinks, but it will damn sure make him think before he speaks again.

lol, before we all get kunty over that, it's an analogy.
 
And how much did that comment add to the site.

More than the drivel you expel. I've never seen you advance an argument, you just drag a conversation down into hyperboly and circular reasoning. Johnnie's straw man link defines your style perfectly, as demonstrated by calling me an IS sympathiser. Some people simply never develop the ability to critically analyse information or challenge their own assumptions, you're more a product of circumstance than anything else; but when people can't be bothered continuing to debate with you it's because it's completely pointless, not because you're gradually convincing the masses. It's like banging your head against a wall...only not as much fun.
 
I don't know Bazza, It's just interesting that most shootings are where there are gun free zones.
There are good arguments both sides, but in hindsight if I was in the lindt shop and had a gun along with everyone else, the scumbag bastard would think twice about what it did.

Don't stir the pot ffs
 
I've never seen you advance an argument,
you just drag a conversation down into hyperboly and circular reasoning.
Some people simply never develop the ability to critically analyse information or challenge their own assumptions,
you're more a product of circumstance than anything else;
but when people can't be bothered continuing to debate with you it's because it's completely pointless, not because you're gradually convincing the masses. It's like banging your head against a wall...only not as much fun.


The interesting thing is, you read like that most of your so-called debates end with a series of gratuitous random pictures and GIF's, which some are quite funny BTW.

Carry-on
 
The interesting thing is, you read like that most of your so-called debates end with gratuitous random picture, which some are quite funny BTW.

Carry-on

Yep. Maybe levity is preferable at some junctures. A picture can say a thousand words etc etc. At least I can have an intelligent conversation when required.
 
average joe blogs in australia flips out and decides to take revenge on the world. well good fucking thing its going to be hard for him to get a gun without planning and some serious connections

joe blogs flips out in the states, well we know what happens.
 
Top