• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.
in agreement with tim to some extent, although it may be fitting to have masters comps for powerlifting and weightlifting, records could be enough as some recognition.

Is that what you are saying bazza?
 
yes, there are differences over how to reward masters, but some recognition at meets probably necessary.

I held a few CAPO records age 45-49 a few years go because no one my age then and records new; I was actually embarrassed holding them. I never even bothered collecting record certificates.

Fortunately, they have been easily smashed.

But if I had ever got top three against all masters at Aussies, I would have been proud to have trophy or medal because I would have performed against a decent number of competitors. Just three trophies for all masters lifters over 40.

So, I believe you need both records and trophies, in some form.
 
The way GPC is run, is my view Chris, that's why we've structured it that way.

There are NO age categories in meets.
We don't lower the rings in basketball because someone is short, so why do the same with PL?

PL is about lifting weights, and particularly, the person who can lift the most at a particular body weight.

By eliminating all of the teen/junior/masters divisions, we've gone from winning by default, by having to beat up to 20 lifters, in your class at a meet.

The only reason age categories exist at GPC is for records.

We do however, at our nationals, give a 1st place to male/female teen/masters based on gloss.
 
sticky, yes that is up to each fed.

my own preference would be to at least provide a trophy/s at state or national titles for overall masters (as you do with winner).

When I compete at GPC titles later in 2015, I will be looking to see how I fare against all other masters. But that is just me. For myself, I would rather get top three score overall than a record. But don't think I will ever need to worry about it that much given high standard.
 
The way GPC is run, is my view Chris, that's why we've structured it that way.

There are NO age categories in meets.
We don't lower the rings in basketball because someone is short, so why do the same with PL?

PL is about lifting weights, and particularly, the person who can lift the most at a particular body weight.

By eliminating all of the teen/junior/masters divisions, we've gone from winning by default, by having to beat up to 20 lifters, in your class at a meet.

The only reason age categories exist at GPC is for records.

We do however, at our nationals, give a 1st place to male/female teen/masters based on gloss.

I like it.

I remember when I first found out about powerlifting over 10 years ago. I knew nothing about it. I googled some aussie comps and in my weight class there were only 2 lifters. I lost interest, that's not a competition and kept playing footy. If the timing had been better with comps like sticky has been putting on I probably would have looked at lot harder at it.
 
It's never to late man.

We didn't like what our old fed was doing, or how it was run, so we started gpc, based on what we believed was true to what powerlifting was about.

3 years later, we are the biggest fed - the other 2 had a 20 year head start. I guess that means people agreed with us.

The Nationals this year should see 20 lifters in 82.5/90/100/110 classes for sure.

A bit less in the others, but the popular classes are always stacked with real competition.
 
I still might at some stage but I'm too busy at the moment to even get consistent training in. I'll play footy for a bit longer yet then think about it, will probably blow out to 120kg weight class after footy lol.
 
Huh?

its not cheating if it's a "not tested" fed

No. If I remember right from other discussions on this, in the untested Feds the rules still state that you can't be on PEDs. It's still cheating just that you're not getting caught. So yes it is cheating if you are breaking the rules.
 
No. If I remember right from other discussions on this, in the untested Feds the rules still state that you can't be on PEDs. It's still cheating just that you're not getting caught. So yes it is cheating if you are breaking the rules.

Each to their own.
 
yes, gerry you should give back that medal, you did not beat anyone and came second last overall in masters.

Have some dignity mate.

And gerry, have you ever been to Rob's place, I have.

lol you could of shown up and out totalled me spart...exept your 100 kgs...taken roids and cant squat for shet.in my defense i lost 10 kgs pretty quickly.it hurt on the day.one thing it has taught me is not to look smugly at smaller competitors in the 74s and 83s who cant quite squat what i can..its bloody hard being light and squatting big.
im the reigning m1@83 asia oceania champ sucka.btw.thought i would remind you.
ima go shine those medals again.i like to wear them around pretending im the mayor.

read it and weep.your life is a case of coulda shoulda woulda....and never.
 
Last edited:
its in the books baby. enjoy.and its a crap total but i wasnt in a position to pay for competitors to fly in at my expense to come beat me.u may lobby the IPF vigorously to change the categories.good luck.knob.
 
Last edited:
The way GPC is run, is my view Chris, that's why we've structured it that way.

There are NO age categories in meets.
We don't lower the rings in basketball because someone is short, so why do the same with PL?

PL is about lifting weights, and particularly, the person who can lift the most at a particular body weight.

By eliminating all of the teen/junior/masters divisions, we've gone from winning by default, by having to beat up to 20 lifters, in your class at a meet.

The only reason age categories exist at GPC is for records.

We do however, at our nationals, give a 1st place to male/female teen/masters based on gloss.

why not go further and eliminate weight classes?lol at getting rid of juniors as well.crazy.
 
Last edited:
I like the fact there are no age groups in GPC - just another way to spark competition.....
 
It's not about being fair, it's about creating a competition.

Do you think that a 17yo kid, doing his first meet deserves a medal?

Medals should be earned, not given out for participation.
They mean nothing if it's given to you by default.
 
hey sticky its kinda like saying you arent really a world champ because some russian somewhere couldnt make it,or 8 guys in the IPF would wipe the floor with you...noone takes away the fact you went in and won.simple as that.this spart dweeb competes once badly and thinks hes george bush.
 
Top