I think you're all debating different points of view. The people saying it does nothing for squats are coming from a powerlifter view point. Some people squat purely to work the quads for body building training. Once you go below parallel, the hamstrings and glutes are engaged more. So for a pure quad workout, box squats are excellent.
My question was why he felt he needed to go ATG, he didn't even answer.
box squatting is a fad, that died in the arse, many years ago
The hamstring is not engaged more, if you mean "doing work" , they are in fact not doing a lot.
the reality is, the squat is not a very efficiant exercise, it's a leg exercise, and for some there are much better alternatives.
I think the problem with box squats is that many people don't even know how to do them properly. They plop themselves on the jump box with a thud, relax their muscles even, then grunt and grind their way back up again. What a great way to introduce unnecessary shear forces onto the spine! These same people also struggle a great deal to get the weight of the BB onto the centre of their foot.
I think you're all debating different points of view. The people saying it does nothing for squats are coming from a powerlifter view point. Some people squat purely to work the quads for body building training. Once you go below parallel, the hamstrings and glutes are engaged more. So for a pure quad workout, box squats are excellent.
My question was why he felt he needed to go ATG, he didn't even answer.
Again, dismissing information from sources of tried and tested data.
I guess we should all just listen to random dudes on forums with no fitness or nutritional background.