So you or I would be at the Olympic level following the same training?
You would have a much better chance of getting to your genetic potential if you started following that training at 14 and gave it a solid 10+ years.
So you or I would be at the Olympic level following the same training?
Probably not
Don't see the relevance though
I was referring to you saying that they were Olympic champions because of their training routine, therefore if we did the same training we could be the same.
Bazza
Some need to spend a lot more time training or honeing their skill than others this is true, spending time *throwing* weight is risky, spending more time is adding to the risk.
We need to define weight lifting and exercise.
If you want to get to your potential in lifting weights you are going to have to accept some risk.
Some risk.
Andy - who is going to be better at something : the guy performing whatever exercise it is 30 times a week or 100?
Kobe Bryant takes (or at least claims to) 1000(?) shots every day - are you going to tell him he's doing to much 'throwing'?
The closer you try and get to your strength potential the greater the risk, there is really no way around it.
Nobody could really believe that there is some way of training to a 200kg + clean and jerk that is risk free.
No, I'd tell him if it's working to keep doing it
Didn't say risk free.
But a good coach will plan, should plan to keep the risk at a minimum while producing results required.
Ok I just realized this is posted in the "powerlifting" section so I now realize why hamburguler used "westside" as an example.
But as the op stated that he wanted to split his *workout* in two, he should indeed try it, but I'm really not sure what he is exercising for and at what stage he is at in terms of strength.
Tried 30s rest periods? Easily get your volume in. Just have to lower the weight a little.