cleaning up article today in terms of grammar, at least to the best of my ability and attention span.
This is the abstract of what the article is about.
For several decades, governments/societies around the world have made a greater effort to test sports participants for the use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs), aided by legislation. By 2014, however, flaws within national government approaches towards the testing of PEDs remain evident. This article focuses on the example of powerlifting in Australia, a sport where membership remains divided between tested and non-tested federations. While this article does not make a value judgment towards sportspeople who choose to compete in non-tested federations, and acknowledges that the Australian government recognises just one federation in each sport, that being Powerlifting Australia (PA), it argues that the Australian government’s strategy should have been much more pro-active over time if promoting drug-free powerlifting in Australia was the desired public policy goal. This includes minimising issues of division beyond drug-use, such as the degree of transparency and member input.