• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

[MartialArts] National Geographic Channel fight science

H

huski

Guest
anyone seen the doco on the discovery channel named"fight science"?

Fight Science is a television program shown on the National Geographic Channel in which scientists and martial arts masters work together to analyze the world's fighting techniques, to compare the disciplines and to find out which one has the strongest hits, kicks and deadliest weapons. The show also tries to prove through science if certain legends in fighting are possible, such as whether a one-punch knockout is possible,and can a Tae Kwon Do master can really beat his opponment to the punch or if ninja are as nimble and deadly as stories tell. There is also a feature on human strength, wherein a man hits his head on bricks in order to shatter them.


  • The agility of a ninja was confirmed by revealing that one's center of gravity was constantly shifted to balance properly within the limit of the foot. It can be done but takes much practice and possibly years of training.
  • The one-punch knockout and shattering bricks with one's head were confirmed, but only as a perfect shot, and therefore unlikely to be seen in a real-life fight. The punch of the dead was confirmed too, because its VC was 0.8

All weapons were rated on range, control and impact.

  • Eskrima sticks and the were revealed to show extension of range and good control, but would break if sufficient impact was delivered.
  • The nunchaku and the three section staff showed good extension, but it was revealed to be out of control for a fraction of a second after striking an opponent and some of the impact was absorbed due to its flexibility.
  • Shuriken and Bows were really only effective at long-range rather than close-up because once the shuriken was thrown or the arrow released, it was completely out of the user's hands.
  • Swords originally came in two variants: stabbing (like a rapier) or slashing (like a scimitar), but the katana was proven to be highly effective at both.
Fight Science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the show
Fight Science | Fight Science | National Geographic Channel - National Geographic Channel
 
Yes Huski I've seen it about 10 times. Got it on DVD in fact. There's been lots of discussion about whether one can really compare different styles of martial arts and come up with a "winner". It's very interesting to say the least and would recommend martial arts enthusiasts to watch it.


Fadi.
 
I agree with fadi and all the other critics out there that you can't come up with a clear winner , each style has its own advantages over another

It's a rather interesting doco , showing you all the mechanics behind the moves the forces behind punches and kicks
 
Top