S
Agree, I don't think I would be comfortable carrying in public or seeing a fat powerlifting retard walking down the street with an Armalite over the shoulder.
very few people actually "need" a gun, highlighted by the many americans who dont own guns yet still some how manage to function on a day to day basis.
its all just ego bs to get von's small cock twitching coz apparently nothing else does.
I think this just about sums it all up
Anyone notice how the three people Baz, Von and BozotheClown who are the most vehement in their "we luvs Guns" rhetoric are also three Hillbillies who live out in the middle of nowhere where Brothers marry their Sisters.
I can see why people need Guns for work purposes should be allowed guns, but for recreational purposes at the expense of thousands of innocent lives - that's just plain retarded.
most other things we dont "need" cant be used to mass murder people. fuck your stupid.
and most pro gun arguments are based on their "need" of protection and bla bla. so great retort...
Problay time to put down the latte and get out of town once in while. Lol.
Flat white kunt. More Milk. Gotta keep our Dairy Farmers pension plans healthy.
Yeah flat white for me too. Latte has to much milk. Not good for my lactose intolerance.Whats your view on this topic [MENTION=895]Shrek[/MENTION];
very few people actually "need" a gun, highlighted by the many americans who dont own guns yet still some how manage to function on a day to day basis.
its all just ego bs to get von's small cock twitching coz apparently nothing else does.
Food for thought -
In Australia firearm ownership is a privilege and responsibility afforded to some people deemed to be of good character and in good legal standing. In the US firearm ownership is everyone's constitutional right. Which would you prefer?
I think this just about sums it all up
Anyone notice how the three people Baz, Von and BozotheClown who are the most vehement in their "we luvs Guns" rhetoric are also three Hillbillies who live out in the middle of nowhere where Brothers marry their Sisters.
I can see why people need Guns for work purposes should be allowed guns, but for recreational purposes at the expense of thousands of innocent lives - that's just plain retarded.
Fadi, you have to look at the amendment in the context of the time that it was written. The success and stability of the US government was much less assured than it might seem looking back. It sought to protect the capacity of the people in the event that the government went 'off the reservation'. Today the concept seems futile but at that time it was probably effective.Thank you for the reply bozodos, I appreciate it mate. Would you mind clarifying to me what exactly do you mean when you say "government tyranny"? We don't have dictatorship nor puppet regimes here in the west, and we certainly don't suffer from oppression nor suppression. So I'm a bit curious as to what you would consider as being "government tyranny" sir? Thank you very much in advance.
Thank you for that reply sir, it's much appreciated. So would you agree with me, that based on your own post above, that in this day and age, the American citizen has no need or reason to be protecting himself or herself from their government, and perhaps that second amendment ought to be re written to suite today's America instead of yesterday's one? What are your thoughts?Fadi, you have to look at the amendment in the context of the time that it was written. The success and stability of the US government was much less assured than it might seem looking back. It sought to protect the capacity of the people in the event that the government went 'off the reservation'. Today the concept seems futile but at that time it was probably effective.
The safeguard of an armed population is probably unnecessary and certainly futile today but the yanks will have to find another way around the problem because it won't be changed any time soon.Thank you for that reply sir, it's much appreciated. So would you agree with me, that based on your own post above, that in this day and age, the American citizen has no need or reason to be protecting himself or herself from their government, and perhaps that second amendment ought to be re written to suite today's America instead of yesterday's one? What are your thoughts?
Yes but they banned Kinder Surprise. I mean that shit is dangerous. So at least they have their priorities right!Is the gun to blame? Or is the person behind the gun to blame? Whichever side of the debate you take sides with, one thing we all agree on (I hope), is the system that is currently operating in place today in the US, is simply not working, irrespective of the "why"!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?