same you werent paralised
same you werent paralised
You are a bitter sub human aren't you
if you think so.
its also not of sound mind to believe that i am not from dunblane despite the rather overwelming evidence.
also funny how that comment recieved rep's, guess im not the only one who thinks your a twat?
its pretty halirious that you think your better than everyone else, you're really not.
I love the smell of gunpowder
Gun oil mate. They should make an after shave that smells like it.
I still don't know what you are on about. The literature and statistics don't provide a compelling case for stricter gun laws in Australia.
You seem to have a pattern of resorting to insult whenever your feeble intellect is challenged, and worse, pulling the mental health card out as an excuse for just being a ****. That is demeaning to those who struggle with mental illness and who choose to self monitor and be civilised. If you are unwell, sort yourself out. When you have your shit together, come back and play with the big boys.
I caught you out telling tall tales - working as a crowd controller in NSW when you were loaded up to the eyeballs- I guess you had no entry drug test, the bs about your US visa, washing down your psych meds with rum etc.......ffs get a grip.
Gun oil mate. They should make an after shave that smells like it.
You could probably use Froglube as an aftershave tbh lad.
Did you pay for the article bozo?You could probably use Froglube as an aftershave tbh lad.
Yet another study that shows the lack of correlation between the NFA and firearm homicides @vonfram88; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178916300258
The author is also chairperson of a women's pro-shooting organisation.
shame you never post any proof
like your laughable claim that i must be lying about having worked in security because i would fail the drugs test. shame there is no drug test, but dont let that get in the way of your arguments. also who the fuck would lie about having a shit job?
there are solutions to the "problem" in the USA regarding crazy people gaining access to firearms and committing dreadful deeds. However it would not serve my "cause" if I appeared to falter in my pursuit of increased freedom for gun owners in a Australia.
Im actually quite moderate in my views on many subjects and possibly even a closet socialist of sorts. However, having been quite heavily invested in the gun vs no-gun dichotomy, I have learnt that conceding any ground at all to the contrary position does not serve my particular agenda and I'm quite satisfied with how weak and ineffective the anti-gun lobby is at present. I Refer to it as a "dichotomy" not because of an immature binary view of good vs evil or black versus white, but with a realisation that the most vocal of our opponents will maintain their stance and can be quite fanatical.
Gun owners and decent folk let themselves down when bullied by the government post-port Arthur and post-Monash. The ground that was surrendered and the freedom that was given up really achieved nothing at all. The pro-firearms people have learnt how to positively promote their interests now and have even regained some of the lost ground. I'm no fanatic but I must hold the line. I can't for a second consider uttering anything that would enable further compromise of freedom.
Even though I personally would not enjoy carrying an Armalite around in public or concealed carry if I had the freedom to do so (face it - it would have to be a pretty nasty society if we felt we needed to) - I can't and must not suggest that I'm against any measure that increases the availabity of firearms to suitable people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?