Who defines the lack?
What if more increases the physiological response and creates an even greater effect. That is the case then for optimal function more is needed by most people..
Can my rb20 run on e10? Probably.. Is it optimal and in it's best interest? Not fuckinglikley..
But why not feed your body the better product?
What is the advantage? You save $1? I am sure you can save $1 in other things you buy or consume?
Fucking with our food is what is causing all these diseases (whether it be processing, herbicides, pesticides, GMO's etc etc.)...
Why not opt for the choice which is least processed?
I was planning on giving you an essay but I read somewhere that your against raw milk... lol if you can't seem to understand the benefits of raw milk over pasteurized and homogenized milk I am not even going to bother explaining the difference between UHT vs homogenized pasteurized milk...
Goodluck
I know that if anyone here has drank raw milk they would not go back to that white rubbish ever again.
2 totally different products. Simply for taste alone raw wins hands down.
Jesus christ, it's just milk. Eat and drink what you like. People put alot worse shit into their bodies.
I drink milk all the time, and feel fucking fantastic. Doc says I'm all good, so I am going to keep doing it.
Keep your preaching until what you eat 100% of the time is perfect.
This isnt a UHT milk vs raw milk or whatever debate. Its about a mindset of villianising foods and failing to look at the overall picture.
If you eat a varied diet (lean meats, etas, fruit/veg, starches) but fall down with UHT milk you'll probably be okay. If you eat two food types (raw milk and brown rice) then all the rawness in the world isn't going to save you.
Pasteurized milk vs raw milk in a varied diet of 4000 cal. Would it even be statistically variable?
1. The “bigger picture” here is that all the foods you eat are deficient in nutrients through poor soil and from the need to mass produce and make more money... They then compensate through spraying them with chemicals as the plants themselves can’t defend themselves from things such as insects etc. Since the “(lean meats, etas, fruit/veg, starches)” you would be eating would be missing micro nutrients why would you then opt for something like UHT milk over fresh milk (whether it be raw or not)? Why add something that is processed with fewer nutrients on top of your so called “healthy 4000 calorie diet” of lean meats and vegetables (which you probably cook, which then looses even more nutrients and enzymes)?
2. Raw milk and brown rice? Are you kidding? Since when did I say that was my diet?
3. Why not give your body the better option? If I drink 4litres a day of processed milk I won’t get off the toilet for hours, yet if I have 4litres of milk of raw milk I am fine and have no mucous build up... Is this a coincidence? I don’t think so... Give your body what it deserves...
I think the issue here is that you Oliver eat to get stronger... I plan to eat to get stronger and be as healthy as I possibly can...
But you seem as if you have made up your mind though, I am not here to convince you, I am sure your local GP and government will assist you in taking care of yourself with their great advice... But for everyone else here that is reading this eat food the way it is supposed to be. People from my village are 90+ years old lifting more than the average 30yr old can lift, and Oliver trust me there is no such thing as UHT, pasteurized, homogenized even cooked meat... Everything is raw.
I wish you and your 4000calorie diet the best of luck
If I drink 4litres a day of processed milk I won’t get off the toilet for hours, yet if I have 4litres of milk of raw milk I am fine and have no mucous build up... Is this a coincidence? I don’t think so... Give your body what it deserves...
1. The “bigger picture” here is that all the foods you eat are deficient in nutrients through poor soil and from the need to mass produce and make more money... They then compensate through spraying them with chemicals as the plants themselves can’t defend themselves from things such as insects etc.
you have been reading too much hippy shit. Show where our food is deficient in nutrients or grown in poor soil.
A common argument against pasteurization is that calves will die if fed pasteurized milk, so we should drink raw milk just like the calves need to.
This is totally wrong. Calves are actually healthier and have higher growth rates when fed pasteurized milk compared to raw milk. Must all those lost nutrients.
A common argument against pasteurization is that calves will die if fed pasteurized milk, so we should drink raw milk just like the calves need to.
This is totally wrong. Calves are actually healthier and have higher growth rates when fed pasteurized milk compared to raw milk. Must all those lost nutrients.
A common argument against pasteurization is that calves will die if fed pasteurized milk, so we should drink raw milk just like the calves need to.
This is totally wrong. Calves are actually healthier and have higher growth rates when fed pasteurized milk compared to raw milk. Must all those lost nutrients.
Lets not forget why we started pasteurizing milk in the first place - to stop disease.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?