spartacus
Well-known member
Spartacus
yes, it is hard to compare 20 reps and 1 rep, unless one trains for both.
i have always got about 20 reps on 70% of my max, although probably would not if had strict lockout on each rep.
when at peak and benching about 170kg (without pause), I could outrep my mate on reps, although he was a lot stronger for a single 9about 200kg). Fact was i have always done a lot of reps (and short rests), whereas he was always doing sets of no more than 6 reps (with full rest).
I read in one Soviet sports Review in 1980s that 1 rep means 4 reps on 90%, 10 reps on 80%, and 20 reps on 70%.
While it works out roughly for me, many other books have different interpretations.
As PTC indicates, depends very much on training specificity.
yes, it is hard to compare 20 reps and 1 rep, unless one trains for both.
i have always got about 20 reps on 70% of my max, although probably would not if had strict lockout on each rep.
when at peak and benching about 170kg (without pause), I could outrep my mate on reps, although he was a lot stronger for a single 9about 200kg). Fact was i have always done a lot of reps (and short rests), whereas he was always doing sets of no more than 6 reps (with full rest).
I read in one Soviet sports Review in 1980s that 1 rep means 4 reps on 90%, 10 reps on 80%, and 20 reps on 70%.
While it works out roughly for me, many other books have different interpretations.
As PTC indicates, depends very much on training specificity.