*The higher rep scheme in a template will not only build muscle but increase metabolic conditioning, so no aerobic activity is required as long as the HR is maintained at over 120 throughout the workout.
* The lower rep...scheme in a template will build muscle exclusively, especially with the multi-joint movements, hitting the endochrine system hard, but there is a higher risk of adding fatty tissue, so some aerobic activity is required to maintain condition.
A trainee with fresh strength doing 5 reps and under with max kg on the bar to fatigue needs to be especially careful on the first two rep's, as a fresh muscle with 100% strength on a first rep could literally pull muscle off bone, if the trainee, literally jerked the bar using momentum against resistance.
[MENTION=8428]Big Mick[/MENTION]; always misses the good threads
*The higher rep scheme in a template will not only build muscle but increase metabolic conditioning, so no aerobic activity is required as long as the HR is maintained at over 120 throughout the workout.
* The lower rep...scheme in a template will build muscle exclusively, especially with the multi-joint movements, hitting the endochrine system hard, but there is a higher risk of adding fatty tissue, so some aerobic activity is required to maintain condition. .
silverback, my pulse stays over 120 for entire workout. Obviously higher when doing legs. This is because I have a minute max between sets, although odd heavier day and Olympic lifts I take more.
Aerobic fitness is tricky, I don't know how much one needs, what I do know for myself is, the better my condition, the better I recover, not only between workouts, but between sets, whether that is 12~20, or the lower region, of 5~10.
Do you do any conditioning or cardio or just H.I.T?
I'ts better than 120 seconds.
think about this; If you spent 120 seconds doing a set to failure, with a rest of 3 seconds between sets, and maintained that pace for the entire workout, how long do you think that workout would be?
Ok, not sure if I decrypted your answer correctly, but to answer your question.
The workout at 120 second sets and 3 seconds rest would theoretically last if one was able to sustain it 1.5 times as long as 30 seconds sets and 60 seconds on rest.
but I wasn't referring to duration here, more of a method of using heavy low rep sets and limiting rest periods as a way of keeping the heart rate up and making the workout somewhat aerobic.
the duration would depend on how many body parts trained, how many sets, blah blah
Ok ok I confused you and me.
"semi aerobic" as you state, is going to be better (resting 60 seconds) than 120.
if you are going to try and get an aerobic effect from a low rep template, then you just need to make sure what you're doing is safe, in terms of moving very heavy weight for minimal reps.
i suppose I just wanted to get feed back from you, with the question I asked.
doing the workout you do now....using the same exercises, if you increased the time per exercise and reduced the rest time to 3 seconds, how long would you be able to maintain that intensity of work.
I think you'd be doing pretty well if you could maintain that pace for more than 20 minutes, your heart would be reading 220 and you'd be puffing like a train.
imagine if after 3 months of this sort of workout you doubled the KG's you where pulling and pushing.
youd be one fit, strong looking mofo.
You can probably only do this sort of stuff on machines. Hard to imagine applying this to compound movements lol..
It may be the way you worded it but I hope you're not implying that you can't do compound movements with machines.You can probably only do this sort of stuff on machines. Hard to imagine applying this to compound movements lol..