vonfram88
Active member
This topic will canvass views about improving the image of powerlifting whilst also maintaining a satisfactory level of interest in the sport.
I proceed on the following assertion;
That performance enhancing drugs are used by some athletes who compete in strength sports.
A shocking statement, I know. It's difficult for many to recognize the Elephant in the room and I expect some hot-headed and puerile responses, so I am relying on the moderators to objectively moderate.
Acknowledging the success of the GPC movement, which has done much to lift the recognition of the sport, my call is for an improved level of citizenry. Good corporate citizenry is not just about taking a moral stance, it also translates into good business.
I find it hard to accept that any sponsor of an event would NOT want their brand associated with a higher standard of behaviour. Whether we like it or not, community expectations will shift in the wake of the recent high profile doping cases. The sheeple who presently have no stance on the matter will be easy prey for the media and silver-tounged policy makers.
I note that PA has clear policy on the matter of doping. I also note that CAPO has a stance on the matter and has a list of banned substances. Forgive me if I am being ignorant, but I have found it difficult to access any resources on GPC policy in this particular area.
I have heard the cost being cited as a reason/excuse not to test. Yet PA with its rather limited resources manages to comply with ASADA requirements. The other powerlifting organisations are well resourced to find a funding solution so I can see no economic argument against testing. It is also possible that there will be greater subsidy of the cost of testing by the government for NFP's, in the wake of recent events and if enough people jump on the bandwagon.
Does the most prolific and noticed powerlifting organisation (GPC) have an enhanced level of responsibility? Is it now time to take such action as is necessary to improve the profile of the sport?
Clear policy, alignment with community expectations and appointment of suitable ambassadors for the sport are amongst some of the measures that a pro-active organisation might like to consider.
On ambassadors; the finest folks I have met in recent times are the proprietors of the Perth chapter of PTC. Clean living, mild mannered and softly spoken.
I proceed on the following assertion;
That performance enhancing drugs are used by some athletes who compete in strength sports.
A shocking statement, I know. It's difficult for many to recognize the Elephant in the room and I expect some hot-headed and puerile responses, so I am relying on the moderators to objectively moderate.
Acknowledging the success of the GPC movement, which has done much to lift the recognition of the sport, my call is for an improved level of citizenry. Good corporate citizenry is not just about taking a moral stance, it also translates into good business.
I find it hard to accept that any sponsor of an event would NOT want their brand associated with a higher standard of behaviour. Whether we like it or not, community expectations will shift in the wake of the recent high profile doping cases. The sheeple who presently have no stance on the matter will be easy prey for the media and silver-tounged policy makers.
I note that PA has clear policy on the matter of doping. I also note that CAPO has a stance on the matter and has a list of banned substances. Forgive me if I am being ignorant, but I have found it difficult to access any resources on GPC policy in this particular area.
I have heard the cost being cited as a reason/excuse not to test. Yet PA with its rather limited resources manages to comply with ASADA requirements. The other powerlifting organisations are well resourced to find a funding solution so I can see no economic argument against testing. It is also possible that there will be greater subsidy of the cost of testing by the government for NFP's, in the wake of recent events and if enough people jump on the bandwagon.
Does the most prolific and noticed powerlifting organisation (GPC) have an enhanced level of responsibility? Is it now time to take such action as is necessary to improve the profile of the sport?
Clear policy, alignment with community expectations and appointment of suitable ambassadors for the sport are amongst some of the measures that a pro-active organisation might like to consider.
On ambassadors; the finest folks I have met in recent times are the proprietors of the Perth chapter of PTC. Clean living, mild mannered and softly spoken.