MaxBrenner
New member
Actually that paragraph was Alan Aragon schooling some dude from Bodybuilding.com I believe.Just wondering who wrote the post on your post 16 Max? Some random dude wants to have a 90min anabolic window argument
Actually that paragraph was Alan Aragon schooling some dude from Bodybuilding.com I believe.Just wondering who wrote the post on your post 16 Max? Some random dude wants to have a 90min anabolic window argument
Hahahaha @ Berardi nut huggerThanks I was thinking him or Lyle McDonald. This fella is a Berardi nut hugger
Yes that is correct (though some nutrients are oxidized during the digestion process so in all it starts there).
Yeah I'm guessing I've misunderstood you buddy
If you have eaten 250 grams of protein (all from whey) you will just have 25 hours of digesting etc going on. You don't lose it per se. Is that what you mean?
Yeah you got it mate. Just a continual roll over.Yep so it digests for 25 hours. But there are only 24 hours in a day. So if you keep eating 250g of protein a day, eventually it would build up into a large amount of protein waiting to be digested. Eg, if you eat 250g protein a day for 100 days and only digest 240g a day, you would have 10g x 100 = 1kg of protein still waiting to be digested? That's what I was saying.
Nutrition studies / Religion Studies i see no difference..
Lol.
Well with religion there is nothing to observe or measure, only faith.
I see a difference.
Lol.
Well with religion there is nothing to observe or measure, only faith.
I see a difference.
I am with Bazza
Is that what your two year course taught you Christian?
It taught me that the deeper you delve the harder it is to draw a a proper conclusion on something because you need to go the next step to say why.
I don't like the whole of humanities nutrition advice based on small studies from untrained people do a leg extension. Anecdotally there is enough evidence for the 6 as opposed to 3 , 1 , 0 , 150. If something works you do it if not move on, it's really that simple... I have tried if I did t like it, I got weaker, wasn't happy so no point me doing it. I'll continue to eat my 6 1000kcal meals because it works for me.
So because some nutrition studies are small and may not be well done you want to throw all the good research out and compare nutrition to religion were the is nothing to study or observe.
You say some nutrition reasearch is small and disregard it but then then your happy to go with anecdotal evidence of 6 meals working????
You say 6 meal is working for you. Of course it is. Your eating 6000 calories a day, what else do you expect to happen. Do you really believe if you changed to 3 meals of 2000 calories your progress would stop.
That isn't my point you totally missed it... I feel bloated and crap doing 3 of 2000, I feel better with less more often...
I don't think there is a study on me and how I feel so I have to go with what I know. For someone to say the latter is better for me is ridiculous.
I'm not throwing anything out. I'm just basing more on how I function as opposed to how someone tells me I should function...
Nothing here is saying you have to
have 2 or 3 meals a day. Just that 6+ meals is not necessary to feed the muscles or speed metabolism like most bodybuilding myth would have you believe.
Obviously if your bloated on 3 meals and 6 spreads out the food better for you, do it and there is nothing saying you shouldn't.
2000 calorie meals are my idea of fun.