Classic example is how science says the body can't use more than 30g of protein in one sitting, yet all the big guys are eating far more than 30g protein in one sitting....and...they....are....big...
So, if something works, but isn't backed up by science, does that make it wrong or not worthy?
Classic example is how science says the body can't use more than 30g of protein in one sitting, yet all the big guys are eating far more than 30g protein in one sitting....and...they....are....big...
this forum is the epicentre of broscience
Stop.
Are you saying that supplement companies lie?
Shattered.
Cardio makes you fat.
Carbs make you fat
calories dont matter
working hard/putting in effort = overtraining
fat burning zone
weights make you slow n bulky
Carbs can mke you very fat, it all has to do with insulin sensetivity and secretion...
Yes, it has nothing to do with eating 1000's of calories over maintenance, over estimating activity and underestimating food intake.
Carbs can mke you very fat, it all has to do with insulin sensetivity and secretion...
Even if I'm in deficit calories?
Squts are better then Leg press.
This is 100% bro science..
I cant find a double blind placebo study to say otherwise...
What do we do now? Abandon squats?
So this 1000 calories over maintenance is based on what? The esitmated maintenance or what their maintenance actually is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?