Unfortunately he's not a diplomat's asshole. He'd be better suited to a dictatorship with little to do with the outside world. Maybe Kim needs an offsider?
Hey big R, there won't be a need for him to become a dictator (at least not explicitly), as the US has a PhD in supporting and protecting dictators worldwide. Why get your hands dirty when you can ensure someone else can do the killings, oppressing, suppressing, and all the things that you wouldn't do to your own people, whilst hiding behind that fake façade I'd like to call
selective liberal humanism.
Now here are two shameful images that have (in my opinion) reflected upon the mentality of a government that did not wish to take a stand when ethical morality called for it.
Flags at half-mast on the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Saturday January 24th 2015.
Parliament House in Canberra on the same day and date.
A picture is worth a thousand words they say. Well, the above says we fully support and condone the oppressive regime of the un-Islamic kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which by the way has had a full backing by the US since 1945 until our present day.
The half-mast on Saturday was to mark the death of Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz the day before. "As a mark of mourning and respect and in accordance with protocol," we're told.
Respect? Screw human rights, that's only reserved for the west. It's hypocrisy and double standards par excellence!
If someone thinks the governments of the west are innocent and absolved of the chaos that is taking place around the globe and in the middle east (in particular), I say it's time you've reconsidered and re-evaluated your thoughts on the matter.
