• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

Eric Spoto 327.5kg (722lbs) Bench Press World Record

That is the SPF rulebook which is the fed Spoto set this record in
All these different rules confuse me tbh, they seem very subjective and often ignored which is why I try and lift as "legit" as possible so I'm not caught out. I see a fair bit of benching with the bar touching below the sternum in GPC meets for example but am paranoid of being red lighted if I tried it lol
 
0ni said:
That is the SPF rulebook which is the fed Spoto set this record in
All these different rules confuse me tbh, they seem very subjective and often ignored which is why I try and lift as "legit" as possible so I'm not caught out. I see a fair bit of benching with the bar touching below the sternum in GPC meets for example but am paranoid of being red lighted if I tried it lol
Click to expand...

If you don't have a belt, in GPC you can touch as low as your nuts
 
The Hamburgler said:
If you don't have a belt, in GPC you can touch as low as your nuts
Click to expand...

Bar can't touch lower than the sternum, which is fairly subjective.

[FONT=&quot]- [/FONT][FONT=&quot]A[/FONT][FONT=&quot]fter receiving the bar at arm’s length, the lifter shall lower the bar to the chest (not below the sternum) and await the head referee’s signal.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
 
Last edited:
That has since change Liam.

Now that we are multi, you will be at to touch lower. It's just not updated yet.
 
You can touch the abdomen in the IPF now too - it just can't touch the belt, so easy, don't wear one. Apparently it was too hard to judge where someone's chest is because every person's sternum differs. The only real difference between IPF and other feds is head on bench and heels on floor.

And Sticky is right. There is no "pause" rule. The bar must be motionless before the ref gives the press call.

I do think this was touch and go but I've seen the similarly generous calls in the IPF. It happens. Lifter's luck.
 
strong enough? said:
You can touch the abdomen in the IPF now too - it just can't touch the belt, so easy, don't wear one. Apparently it was too hard to judge where someone's chest is because every person's sternum differs. The only real difference between IPF and other feds is head on bench and heels on floor.

And Sticky is right. There is no "pause" rule. The bar must be motionless before the ref gives the press call.

I do think this was touch and go but I've seen the similarly generous calls in the IPF. It happens. Lifter's luck.
Click to expand...

As I explained to Scott yesterday, the motionless rule does effectively mean a pause, and this bench was pretty damn close to touch and go in my books.
 
Sticky said:
Was the bar motionless in this bench?
Click to expand...

Having watched that last vid that 0ni posted I think that the bar could have been considered motionless by the smallest of margins. Spoto definitely did not jump the call like it seemed in a different vid. The call was just very fast. I would have loved that ref if I was benching but not if I was a side ref trying to judge. I'm sure that ref would have had Pam in his ear telling him to slow his roll just a little.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't the bar technically have to be motionless in order to change direction? (nitpicking I know but if the rule book says 'motionless' it's probably relevant)
 
NAPARM said:
Doesn't the bar technically have to be motionless in order to change direction? (nitpicking I know but if the rule book says 'motionless' it's probably relevant)
Click to expand...

It has to be motionless before the ref makes the call and it is allowed to change direction, so by definition that is a pause. The bar must stop.
 
NAPARM said:
Doesn't the bar technically have to be motionless in order to change direction? (nitpicking I know but if the rule book says 'motionless' it's probably relevant)
Click to expand...

Yeah but the moment of time can be 'infinitely small'. Like accelerating from 40km/hr to 80km/hr you are at 60km/hr for a brief instant. Getting into physics here which is probably a bit irrelevant :p

So I believe "motionless" is just anything perceivable. I guess that's why they have a press call, and its up to the judge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top