I actually think there are a lot of studies out there to suggest clean eating gets better results, someone just needs to dig them up.
There are exceptions to the rules (people with great metabolisms and perfectly dialed in macros for their body type). But the majority of people will benefit from clean eating. And saying everyone with great results are on drugs is just a cheap cop out.
Like I said in a previous post, as Bazza says, carbs are just carbs. So try eating sugar as your carb source for a while and see what happens. Good luck getting any fiber and I look forward to your insulin spiking with massive blood sugar crashes.
This is a forum for discussions and 90% of your posts are just mindless ramblings and back tracking.
Like you just said, you said sugar is fine to eat and there are no associated health problems with consuming it. So why not take it to the extreme and only consume sugar for carbs?
Like you just said, you said sugar is fine to eat and there are no associated health problems with consuming it. So why not take it to the extreme and only consume sugar for carbs?
He (Bazza) made no mention of;
" there are no associated health problems with consuming it. So why not take it to the extreme and only consume sugar for carbs?"
He is stating that there is nothing wrong with "cereal".
To my knowledge there is nothing also inherently wrong with sugar.
[MENTION=12409]El Stiffy[/MENTION] ; claims no getting your gun off more than twice a week. Bad for your immune system he says!Except sex. If there's proof of overdosing on that I'm willing to disprove it...
Look for a cereal high in fibre. Personally I like the Honey Almond All-Bran. Fits my macros just fine.
Per serving you are looking at
[TD="class: col-1"]Calories[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]165[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Sodium[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]146 mg[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Total Fat[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]2 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Potassium[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]261 mg[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1 sub"]Saturated[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]0 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Total Carbs[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]27 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1 sub"]Polyunsaturated[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]0 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Dietary Fiber[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]7 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1 sub"]Monounsaturated[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]0 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Sugars[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]12 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1 sub"]Trans[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]0 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Protein[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]5 g[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"]Cholesterol[/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"]0 mg[/TD]
[TD="class: col-1"][/TD]
[TD="class: col-2"][/TD]
Because when you take anything to the extreme it isn't good for you.
Eat a diet of pure protein and see how healthy you are.
Eat only broccoli and see how healthy you are.
Breathe in 100% oxygen and see how you go.
Drink a heap of water and it will kill you.
Therefore according to your thinking. Protein, broccoli, oxygen and water are also bad for you.
I quite often see you state that carbs are carbs. Low GI, fiber, etc all has no meaning to you. You also think nutrient timing is BS. I was trying to make a point that applying your logic to sugar/carbs, an all sugar diet for carbs would fit within your wisdom of nutrition.
The other thing is that all these clean eating advocates can't wait until their cheat meal to eat all the "naughty" foods. Alternatively, you can just eat them in moderation and base your diet on single ingredient foods to ensure you get a good variety of micronutrients.
I never said you said only have sugar for carbs. I said that for a hypothetical based on your views on nutritional timing and claiming there is nothing wrong with sugar. It really isn't that hard to understand for most people.
Chewing makes GI higher, lol ok.
I better not chew my brown rice too much then, otherwise it'll turn into white rice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?