Ya reckon Silverback? The only people i've seen with big calves are former fat people and serious gear users. As for wrist curls, why not do any other exercise that requires grip strength?
What would you consider to be "sub maximally"? I thought it was all relative, and by relative I mean one needs not restrict one's self into looking at each and every single workout (with its individual sets and reps), but rather look at the overall progress that he or she is making over a set period of time.I only consider an "exercise" a waste of time when it is performed sub maximally.
Why would that be now? In other words, why must I go to failure for a set to be productive, and why should resting more than 30 seconds between a set (whether taken to failure or not) be considered a waste of time? I'm interested to hear your answers Andy. Thank you.i mean, going to fatigue, and then resting between a set for more than 30 seconds is counter productive..
A guess an exercise that could be considered a waste of time is one that isnt going to get you closer to your goal - I think everything has its place - I just think sometimes peoples exercise selection based on goal is sometimes incorrect.
What would you consider to be "sub maximally"? I thought it was all relative, and by relative I mean one needs not restrict one's self into looking at each and every single workout (with its individual sets and reps), but rather look at the overall progress that he or she is making over a set period of time.
Why would that be now? In other words, why must I go to failure for a set to be productive, and why should resting more than 30 seconds between a set (whether taken to failure or not) be considered a waste of time? I'm interested to hear your answers Andy. Thank you.
Fadi.
Thank you for the reply Andy.Yes, if one exercises correctly, performs the exercise right with the right load, then you would think one would need less, case in point; doing (as Kaz writes) doing 100 repetitions of sit-ups.
To develop the torso, doing a crunch type movement, under added resistance to fatigue, would need less rep's and sets and stimulate more muscle tissue, and produce less possibility of injury.
your description of going to fatigue, and mine could be totally different, going to fatigue is subjective as your tolerance to pain will differ, but, yes results are tangible.
Going to failure, works, going to failure on an exercise, will mean less is needed, whether it is more or less productive relies on many factors, going to failure, is not only tough to do physically, but also tough mentally, especially if ones workout is predominantly multi joint exercises.
Resting more than 5 seconds between sets of a given exercise allows a fatigued muscle to regain 50% of its fresh strength, some might need multiple sets, other will only need one, but at the end of the day I believe it is the last repetition where the magic happens.
Thank you for the reply Andy.
Consider the can of worms open... What's your reasoning?I'm gonna cop a lot of shit for this... but I think dumbbell flyes are a waste of time.
Definately not a waste, very good to do with a light weight for high reps after benching to stretch the pecs.I'm gonna cop a lot of shit for this... but I think dumbbell flyes are a waste of time.