Ok, once again let me spell it out for the pedants on here. Anything labelled or promoted as 'fat free' where the fats have been replaced with other substances e.g. sugars which negate any health benefits from removing the fat, and may encourage people who don't have adequate nutritional knowledge to fall into the trap of thinking they can have more of it as a result.
I reckon 9/10 arguments on here are started by kunce nitpicking. If you know what the underlying message is e.g. if you were talking to a mate and could say 'I know what you mean' why argue? Frankly having to spell everything out to the nth degree and making sure there is no avenue for some prick to debate with you is time consuming, frustrating because you can see it coming a mile off (and the above is no exception), and a waste of words because what could be said in a couple of sentences becomes multiple paragraphs.
Yes Baz, broccoli is fat free. Am I saying that it is not healthy as a result? Ffs...