candyflip
Fatty
Anyone read this? I just got through all 500+ pages. He advises against this (reading everything), but I wanted to know everything he had learned. I admit I skim-read the improving your baseball bat swinging section though.
What do you think? It appears to me there's lots of stuff in here that keen observers of the iron would already know - but his main contention with Occam's Protocol is to do radically less to gain more, and that is at least at odds with most of what we currently accept as fact in the BB world.
I was gonna jot down Cliff notes for the whole thing, but couldn't be bothered. Some of it is great, but some appears very contradictory and the science appears to be completely off (for example, he makes a point that doing Stairmaster climbs for an hour is essentially a waste of time, as your basal metabolic rate would be about a 100 calorie burn, and a 1 hour Stairmaster climb burns only approx 107 calories, therefore you could have sat on the couch doing nothing and burned only 7 calories less than doing the Stairmaster exercise....Ummm, from what I know of the human machine, that is just completely and utterly wrong. It would be the 100 calorie basal metabolic rate, PLUS the 107 calorie Stairmaster burn for a total of 207 calories approx. Happy to be shown I'm wrong though..)
If you want to read it, I can help, BTW.
What do you think? It appears to me there's lots of stuff in here that keen observers of the iron would already know - but his main contention with Occam's Protocol is to do radically less to gain more, and that is at least at odds with most of what we currently accept as fact in the BB world.
I was gonna jot down Cliff notes for the whole thing, but couldn't be bothered. Some of it is great, but some appears very contradictory and the science appears to be completely off (for example, he makes a point that doing Stairmaster climbs for an hour is essentially a waste of time, as your basal metabolic rate would be about a 100 calorie burn, and a 1 hour Stairmaster climb burns only approx 107 calories, therefore you could have sat on the couch doing nothing and burned only 7 calories less than doing the Stairmaster exercise....Ummm, from what I know of the human machine, that is just completely and utterly wrong. It would be the 100 calorie basal metabolic rate, PLUS the 107 calorie Stairmaster burn for a total of 207 calories approx. Happy to be shown I'm wrong though..)
If you want to read it, I can help, BTW.