I had a rant in the supplement section yesterday, and I've made a vow never to go in there again.
I cant stand it when people quote text books. If I want that information, I go to Google and look it up. I'm not saying text books arent accurate, its just that I'd rather here your OWN experiences, I can look up other peoples as easily as you can.
Imagine if I came on here in the strength section, cutting and pasting information from text books, I'd be ridiculed if I didnt produce real world facts with that information.
That rule doesnt apply with nutrition unfortunately.
This week I had a new client, a member from here, buy some stuff off me. He didnt require a program. He had a text book with all the best training info.
Now I'm not going to say it is or isnt a great text book. But those that usually post quotations from text books to back up their arguments may have an opinion.
Recently Kyle was shot down for questioning a quote from a text book, the guy that shot him down detests split routines and isolation exercises, really having a crack at those that post them up.
This text book that the guy is using as a guide comes from arguably the greatest BB of all time. His training must be accurate and we cant argue, its in a text book, and he is super famous and uber succesful.
To all you ass clowns that believe everything you read, and dare not question info coming from books, dont ever have a crack at anyone doing double splits with 20 sets a bodypart, morning and night, with a full compliment of isolation exercises.
Arnolds Encyclopedia of Body Building MUST be correct. He used it and got bigger AND stronger than all of us.
To the guy that emailed me, I'm not saying the book is garbage, its all the supplement gobbling isolation flaming armchair pimply experts that are.
But if you go to another section, they'll gladly quote you from a book that staring at earth worms while drinking Bonox at 11.37pm will cure Herpes.
I cant stand it when people quote text books. If I want that information, I go to Google and look it up. I'm not saying text books arent accurate, its just that I'd rather here your OWN experiences, I can look up other peoples as easily as you can.
Imagine if I came on here in the strength section, cutting and pasting information from text books, I'd be ridiculed if I didnt produce real world facts with that information.
That rule doesnt apply with nutrition unfortunately.
This week I had a new client, a member from here, buy some stuff off me. He didnt require a program. He had a text book with all the best training info.
Now I'm not going to say it is or isnt a great text book. But those that usually post quotations from text books to back up their arguments may have an opinion.
Recently Kyle was shot down for questioning a quote from a text book, the guy that shot him down detests split routines and isolation exercises, really having a crack at those that post them up.
This text book that the guy is using as a guide comes from arguably the greatest BB of all time. His training must be accurate and we cant argue, its in a text book, and he is super famous and uber succesful.
To all you ass clowns that believe everything you read, and dare not question info coming from books, dont ever have a crack at anyone doing double splits with 20 sets a bodypart, morning and night, with a full compliment of isolation exercises.
Arnolds Encyclopedia of Body Building MUST be correct. He used it and got bigger AND stronger than all of us.
To the guy that emailed me, I'm not saying the book is garbage, its all the supplement gobbling isolation flaming armchair pimply experts that are.
But if you go to another section, they'll gladly quote you from a book that staring at earth worms while drinking Bonox at 11.37pm will cure Herpes.