-
Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.
Neddysmith
Standard kunce
in those comparison shots i would hve to go with Phil, seems to hve tighter waist and better symetry from the back, although Big Ron's arms look bigger i dont think it quite makes up for the rest, very tough call though.....
Fister Roboto
Irish Kunce
Gotta go with Ronnie. Phil has the upper hand in a few areas but not enough IMO
Repacked
Punxsutawney resident
Remembering that these are just photos and may not accurately convey the package on stage and that the most recent pic of Phil is apparently 2013 and alot can change in the better part of 2 years, my opinion is that -
Ronnie has better developed arms, particularly biceps with better separation and a better peak, although Phil improves greatly between the two pics.
Ronnie's abs are more comprehensive and defined.
Ronnie's ercetors and glutes are more developed and thicker.
IMO Ronnie's legs are a little more developed e.g. vastus medialis, but it could just be how they are posing. In the second pics he definitely has more vascular legs.
Ronnie definitely has more mass overall, whether this appeals to you or not is personal preference. Phil does have a much thinner waist and the shape of his lats accentuate that, however Ronnie has a bit more meat in his lats and personally I find that more visually striking. The two have very different physiques. Particularly in the first pics Phil's transverse abdominis looks better. Both have strong points and no doubt Phil will continue to improve, but based purely on these pics, I prefer Ronnie's physique. However we all know how subjective this sport is.....
Fister Roboto
Irish Kunce
Question. Is that ridiculous bicep peak Ronnie has legit or site enhancement?
How easy is it to tell?
How easy is it to tell?
Goosey
.
Well, Phil has overall good symmetry
his biceps are longer and arms overall better shaped.
forearms are a better shape and larger
pecs are smaller but the symmetry is almost perfect
same with lat's and overall back, symmetry is is incredible.
butt cheeks are symmetric compared to rons.
legs, can't see them
im no avid follower just my ob's
his biceps are longer and arms overall better shaped.
forearms are a better shape and larger
pecs are smaller but the symmetry is almost perfect
same with lat's and overall back, symmetry is is incredible.
butt cheeks are symmetric compared to rons.
legs, can't see them
im no avid follower just my ob's
