SP, I will let you know. I reckon a few would. last time I looked this thread had been read 16,800 times, so there may be some interest. Here's hoping. I know that 4 people have read my article draft so far, so getting one more should not be too hard. Oh, strong enough will make five. Also, heads of two other feds are looking forward to reading it. that makes seven.
6800 reads collectively of five pieces I had published on one sports site, so maybe some of them will also read it when (if) I do an opinion piece summarising article.
http://www.theroar.com.au/author/chris-lewis/
There is also another popular policy online forum that has published many of my articles.
I am surprised someone with a PhD would say something like that about an article that may go in one of the top sports academic journals overseas. But then again, you appear a lot more confident on forums as long as your words aren't actually cited.
and, I should not brag, but two pms read some of my work, so why not send them a copy as well.
But no need for you to read it. Even after sticky suggests that my piece actually talks about how PA could improve, you have to bag my effort.
Tell Rob I said hi.
This is true, but I strongly argue that pa could be a lot more attractive in terms of a couple of non-drug issues, in line with overseas examples. Some of us consider these issues important, at least I do.
i have already said it rugby, an alternative summary of Aust powerlifting other than version provided by Wilks. That is it pretty much, although there is other aspects to it.
Coutinho argues that ‘authoritarian monopolistic political rule by federation leaders is undesirable’ and that any dilemma ‘can only be solved with transparency’ and by ‘intelligence, education, ethics and common sense’ (Coutinho, 2013).
How on earth can you defend a claim that it's an ineffective policy?
It works within PA, GPC and CAPO choose to except themselves and ADFPF has no reason to exist separately from PA apart from a couple of vendettas.
As far as I see it, you're trying to claim that public policy is bad because there is a group of lifters who do not wish to be tested and would not agree to be tested even if it were offered.
I am not interested in politics of powerlifting; I just write about it to help balance record with regard to events over last 20 years.
I think most people who read it will find it fairly balanced, although there will be a few who do not like it.
Hey, I write about all kinds of policy: BER, HIP, Aus and international politics, and now powerlifting.
It gives me something to do.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?