So Ben, I notice you have modified every persons use of quotes in this thread.
Why is that? Because SP asked.
Do forum members know that their posts, have had quotes used removed?
Shrek, is that ok with you? Clearly, this action opposes me and favours one who now regrets making a whole lot of stated words.
This is now getting ridiculous?
grammar, never bother til last draft.
Why is it a dog act Brick?
If you are talking about SP comment in article, i have already said I am removing his name. I never thought that use would cause problems.
Merely pointing out that you seem to be quite the divisive figure at the moment. How that plays out in the long run remains to be seen. I have no problem with Wilks, nor you.Thanks sandman, I thought you thought better of me. I will never be seen in the same light as Wilks, far different persona which will be reflected in the balance of the article, despite my preference for drug-testing.
Didn't realise no one had the right to research a sport and point out strengths and weaknesses of a nation's approach.
Ok in the USA, but not here, hey.
As the ASC told me, it conducts no research on Aust powerlifting. Perhaps we should leave it to a version that could be provided by Wilks. I think only some PA lifters would be happy with that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?