great article. Loving Layne's new blogs.
I feel great now that I am no longer following the nutritional dogma that I danced along to for years. From the data I have I found, strength based athletes don't need much more than 1.7g kg/day of protein. Of course every 'body' is different, so nitrogen balance is a very personal thing. Having the '2.8g kg/day' amount is quite excessive. Data also suggests that athletes don't need more protein than non-resistance training people. While I'm here I'll quickly say calories should be split into about 55% carbs, 25% fat and 20% pro.
Oxidation of amino acids is pretty much a last resort for the body, in terms of turning muscle into glucose. This would take literally hours of high intensity work. Most of us aren't doing that. The oxidation of free fatty acids will happen first..after muscular glycogen is depleted which takes about 2 hours (depending on intensity of movement). I'd talk about post workout nutrition but I've covered too much now.
Do bodybuilders need more pro than a hammer thrower or rower? Maybe. Maybe not. 2.8g kg/day is a lot more than the 1.7g kg/day tha the AIS recommend. Let's not forget what the AIS do and how science driven....and their avoidance of bro-science which often goes undetected.
The benefits of a high protein diet are best illustrated by looking at those that eat a low protein diet. The reason asian races have a small stature and poor eyesight is purely due to a low protein intake in their diet.
Maybe we should look at what other countries recommend rather than the AIS after our poor Olympic performance.
Poor logical argument.
There are many factors contributing to who gets brass at international sporting events. Moldova is smaller in population ...yet took home 2 weightlifting bronze medals, 2 more than New Zealand. Factors include cultural outlook, political national style (the more liberal a nation is, the less brass they gain. Communist Russia, china, north korea, Bulgaria...). Other factors include geographical climate, hosting the event, tradition. Tradition? Its tradition for Aus to do swimming and so forth so much effort goes into that development. The wealth of the nation is also a big factor.
Drugs help....but isn't a defying factor, since if 6 competitors are in a race and 4 of them have used PED, its the other variables that will determine the winner.
The benefits of a high protein diet are best illustrated by looking at those that eat a low protein diet. The reason asian races have a small stature and poor eyesight is purely due to a low protein intake in their diet.
yep - to much white rice with no vitamins or minerals in it
Pretty weird that processed rice polished/milled - white rice is cheaper than unprocessed/partially milled - brown , black or red rice
No just lack of protein lack of good nutrition but thats changed a lot in the last 50 years
Look at the younger generations in China , Korea and Japan the heights are shooting up to 6 foot+.
Care to explain where my logic is missing pb?
Eating a high protein diet makes people bigger seems fucking logical to me. Groups of people that eat little protein in their diet are of small stature.
If you can't connect the dots your the one with poor logic.
How sure are you that it's mainly the amino acid making people bigger and not the free fatty acids or the direct forms of carbohydrates? Bro-science dictates the more pro the bigger you get.
I can't be bothered finding it but i think Max or Dave posted a study showing better muscle retention when cutting on 2.6g/kg protein vs 2g/kg or something similar to that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?