I'll weight a lot more when I start, I don't see the point in starting until I can prove to myself I can manipulate my bodyweight with ease, as I said before you can't out-hormone a shitty diet
But my first cycle will be 250mg testosterone with 600mg equipoise a week
Then when I start stalling out on that I'll drop the equipoise to 300mg and add 200mg a week of trenbolone. Then all I need to do is slowly bump up the dosages of equi and tren
you gonna be bigger than jay cutler bro
I doubt that lol, didn't start young enough and I will never be able to afford gh and slin... I think the Steeve Reeves pic in your avatar is a good goal physique for me, only I'd like to be leaner
reeves has great genetics... im not sure if you do or don't. just sayin'
reeves has great genetics... im not sure if you do or don't. just sayin'
Whos the guy that took a lot of HGH and looked like shit... Kneegrow guy with a huge muscle gut..... Turns out he couldn't out cycle his genetics.
I'm pretty confident I have the genetics to roid myself up to that size lol
Sure I may not have the same structure or insertion points (I actually have no idea if I have good "genetics" or not, never even bothered to check, although I do have good trap and lat insertions) but I can easily get as big as him and in a lot better condition than him, as can anyone on this site
It's a killer physique to aim for though
hmm, post a pic of good lat insertions and bad ones
http://ausbb.com/bodybuilding-training-discussions/15122-palumboism.htmlWhos the guy that took a lot of HGH and looked like shit... Kneegrow guy with a huge muscle gut..... Turns out he couldn't out cycle his genetics.
Good lat insertions are low down, near waist
Bad lat insertions are higher up
There have been Mr. Olympias with both insertions though, which kinda proves my point some more
damn.. ive always wanted big powerful lats... What do you think.. decent insertions (link below)? Im planning to compete as a natty in 3-4 years or so so it would help having good insertions.
Mind you i was a fatty then and have since leaned down so its probably not the right pictures to look at, from december.
http://ausbb.com/official-2012-body...ddys-2012-body-transformation.html#post232221
and heres a better pic last year - http://ausbb.com/official-2012-body...ddys-2012-body-transformation.html#post232221
what you reckon?
You don't start off with the conclusion and then search for one elusive study to support that conclusion. It's bad science.
You look at the observed data, interpret it and arrive at a conclusion.
You had no sides with Anadrol? no water retention? No blood preasure issues? Thats pretty good coz its one of the more harsh drugs you can use...heard some bad things about anadrol.
Can I ask why you dont believe test should be the base of most cycles? just asking coz I have always heard test should be the base of most cycles...
I didn't gets sides off of anadrol either, not even water bloat although I ran a fairly modest dose for a short period of time
Didn't get negative side effects but didn't get positive side effects either such as weight/strength gain?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?