• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

Linear progression

Was he teaching me anything? Because I'm pretty sure I already knew that linear had its place as simple and easy workout for beginners. I was just making a generalisation about its overall efficiency and usage.
 
maybe no, but there is nothing wrong with my appreciation of sound teaching methods. I was merely saluting Silverback.
 
Was he teaching me anything? Because I'm pretty sure I already knew that linear had its place as simple and easy workout for beginners. I was just making a generalisation about its overall efficiency and usage.

You don't need teaching, me on the other hand, learn something every day, I think I'll still die stupid.
 
You don't need teaching, me on the other hand, learn something every day, I think I'll still die stupid.

Everybody is stupid to varying degrees, it just takes the smart ones to realise this. The more you know, the more you know how little you know.
 
Don't be modest Silverback. Are you saying you can't teach el freako aspects of strength traning?
 
No one knows the best way to train for strength because there is no single best way. Too many variables.
 
You still have done pretty well, 185kg bench at 93kg alone, along with a good total.

anyone that improves, and gets to a good standard, knows what they are doing.
 
For every individual there are different variables yes, but some ways are generally better than others IMO.

Of course. I just think there are many ways to improve, and to ensure enough intensity. If I was a coach, i would tailor program simply to their mental makeup and ability to recover. This would vary from individual to individual, as I do not believe in one size fits all.

I have seen this with boxing and horse trainers. They adapt training according to individual traits.

Some people are workhorses, others are finely tuned and burn out easily.
 


You touch on a very good topic [MENTION=6618]spartacus[/MENTION];

A good coach, and I mean a good coach instinctively knows what's best for an *individual* in regards to extracting the raw material to build muscles quickly and *safely* this comes from many, many years of dealing with many many trainees.
This coach doesn't necessarily always exhibit the physique of a champion, but produces many.
Most coaches, just cherry-pick.
 
This is very true.

For any coaching position, I think it is important to just sit down and talk with athlete just to get an understanding of past, whether it be training, lack of training, diet, interests and so on.

It is quite possible that some of the best talent is hidden by so many aspects being wrong in their training and life. This may be reversed if key aspects change. It could be diet, it could be going too heavy to often, could be stress, or even a combination.

At same time, if something is working, say an athlete has been doing well doing well by doing not that much, I would be reluctant to make much change, at least until improvement rate wanes. I have seen so many powerful kids, not even training for that sport, be ruined by so-called experts from overload. And this includes coaches who were top athletes.
 
Last edited:
Linear progression is used commonly because it is easy to teach and coach with minimal effort from the person doing the coaching
 
Not taken or read as a show up, I've tried to make it clear I'm not arguing or disagreeing, so I'll take everything in the context of the conversation.

So basically I assumed you were talking about much more sets than you were.. I admit I have only browsed over this for now, but it's around the 10-15 range that I was talking of, remembering that's not referring to the load I spoke of in the OP is more easing back and treading lightly from injuries..

Chinese are boss

Edit- read more, I see what your saying, it's gona depend a lot on the rep range though, teams/trainees doing more sets of 5 are gona have less working sets, that will trend to be more the beginners, as their form won't break down as much than with lots of heavy sets 1-3, but also on the coach, lots of them won't do less than 3 for back squat, because of their believes regarding the carry over for the back squat, and the uselessness (if even a word) of a grinding rep.. Watch someone like lu, or even Ilya (though I think that's a contradiction, as I think he does heaps of 1-3 work), and they arely do a rep that looks tough, usually doing perfect reps, and lu, from what I've read, unless in a taper, does mostly 3-5, but that's anyone's guess as to what is and isn't true regarding his programming..

From experience, I found that 5x5 can be easily as hard as days where I've had 10 working sets all above 85% and all 1-3 range, but I would classify myself as a beginner- early intermediate at best, given my max is around 155 @~73


Off topic, but on topic, you seen much of squat nemesis? I like the idea, but probably needs someone who knows alot more about programming towards dates to tweak it rather than just going in and doing it as the basic template is laid out
 
Last edited:
Yeah I think you should be doing 10-20 sets a week combined fronts and backs
What did I originally post? I think it started off at 10 sets of squats a week + fronts and increased in sets as the number of reps decreased.
But yeah, if you're stuck then increasing the volume will give results the majority of the time unless you're lifting with fucked up technique
 
Yeah I agree what you're saying. You want good clean reps not really grinders. I'd keep a rep in the tank.
I'll have a look at that squat nemesis program now!
 
I should add that increasing the volume is part of the answer but not, by itself, the goal