Ooooooh alarm bells ....
OK folks, take as much care in noting your BF% as you do BMI.
Yep, that's right.
Those pics don't actually mean much in the real world.
Why?
Because BF% is misunderstood. Yes, it's a guideline yada yada yada .. blah blah BUT it's not a very good one at all.
The only way to use it meaningfully is if you do a comparison over time on yourself....looking for relative changes. That's cool. But as an absolute number it's meaningless.
Why?
Because it does not tell you how much BF you actually have ... ie whether it is high or low in an absolute sense. It is not a measure of BF in isolation.
If your LBM (including bone, muscle, other lean tissue) is extremely high or very low for you as an individual, this measure may well provide you with a misleading guide as to what you ought to focus on with diet etc.
Anyone who's had a DEXA scan would know this...you only look at the absolute numbers in KG and what they mean for your frame, age, weight, yada yada.
good example...me. From those pics, I'd be saying I look as though I'd be well unde 15% BF. Yay me.
Then I get my DEXA done.... OMG kill me now....my BF% is 24.9%
Quick, fat loss is the focus! Well, hang on....hmmm looking at my BF in kg and everything else on the DEXA, I'm in the ultra ultra lean category. Losing fat is gonna be a challenge that could end up with bad health ramifications as i don't have a lot to lose.
Why is the % so high? Am I skinny fat? Yes and No.
Not a lot of LBM on that exoskeleton. I need to put on 7 - 10kg of LBM. To be a lean, mean fightin' machine. But I'm not fat on the inside.
Moral of the story ... be careful in how you interpret and use BF% results, however you measure them.
CONTEXT is the key .. you need all your info, not just this measure.