• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

How do you define 'natural'?

You mean I too can look like this

if i just stick to eating right and my creatine?! wow , so psyched right now!

 

hate to break it to you, but:

a) there is no such thing as "slander" or "libel" anymore: they were combined together years ago as defamation. just for future reference, slander was verbal and libel was print/written.

b) you can't have defamation of character without causing the plaintiff damages, usually in the form of financial loss due to the defamation causing negative impact to their reputation.
 

Defamation is real though..


Ask thes guys...

Cyber poison-penner hunted down and sued | theage.com.au
 
Someone post their license along with the accusation ronnie coleman is on steroids...

Would amount to the same thing.

How does being dead make you immune to criticism? It doesn't, that's fucking stupid. Some might not even consider it criticism, just a statement 'he likely used PEDs' doesnt necessarily pass judgement on his choices.
 
nazzysmith said:
Defamation is real though..


Ask thes guys...

Cyber poison-penner hunted down and sued | theage.com.au
Click to expand...

oh i agree that its real. all i'm saying is: how does saying the was on PEDs cause him financial loss?
in the examples of CEOs etc, that can damage their reputation, and the reputation of their companies, causing them financial loss.
its not like Luke Woods or his beneficiaries are going to suffer financial loss due to the above statements and, as far as i'm aware, you can only attach punitive damages to a case, not claim them independently
 
could if his family is getting royalties and earnings from the use of his image/photos and "reputation". Theres also the possibility it may cause distress to his family whom some members may be unaware of the high likelihood he was quite a steroid user.
 
OP, you question in your initial post, "should athletes that have taken steroids 5 or more years ago but no have not since then" i wasnt aware that was the rule and accepted but would even heavy AAS use 5 or more years ago be able to be maintained in any human? Even with perfect training and diet would one be able to retain the size and strength they gained during their AAS use?

Serious question as im unaware just how long the extra mass would be able to be maintained, maybe there is a reason they say 5 years?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register