One thing I would like to know is if bbers using slin are going to benefit from meal timing...
JISSN | Abstract | The effect of protein timing on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a meta-analysis
As alan concludes... Protein timing in the main is BS...
Re: insulin...
I wondered on this one as insulin injections is what supposedly makes the beasts..
insulin being the main transporter of nutrients and what not... Wondered if timing of meals around insulin injections had any relevance???
I love how all theses - people come back with Bro-sciencet is "bro-science"? Following lthy eating plan, eating protein/carbs after training? - isnt that just common sense - and is based on real-world results?
I still dont get what bro-science is....I think people just through this term around when 1. they dont know what the subject is about and/or 2. to make themselves feel better for not being focused enough on training/diet and try and preach that it is ok not to do this and you will still get results - yea you will but just not as good results.
I love how all these articles - people come back with Bro-science - what is "bro-science"? Following a healthy eating plan, eating protein/carbs after training? - isnt that just common sense - and is based on real-world results?
I still dont get what bro-science is....I think people just through this term around when 1. they dont know what the subject is about and/or 2. to make themselves feel better for not being focused enough on training/diet and try and preach that it is ok not to do this and you will still get results - yea you will but just not as good results.
I love how all these articles - people come back with Bro-science - what is "bro-science"? Following a healthy eating plan, eating protein/carbs after training? - isnt that just common sense - and is based on real-world results?
I still dont get what bro-science is....I think people just through this term around when 1. they dont know what the subject is about and/or 2. to make themselves feel better for not being focused enough on training/diet and try and preach that it is ok not to do this and you will still get results - yea you will but just not as good results.
"bro-science" is a term used by people that have made little to no progress in their endeavours to discredit huge amounts of empirical evidence that supports a hypothesis.
There is nothing wrong with using a correlation to imply a causation and I prefer not to take chances with my gains and my PBs. Especially when it's as simple as eating more meat or making sure you eat food around the time you train. People seem to like to try and get away with the bare minimum and it's something I never understood at all. It's loss aversion at best and downright reckless at worst.
Sheiko found out that increasing volume in the first 6 years of training increased results. He didn't find the exact process behind why he just noticed a correlation and ran with it. Fucking broscientist right? I'll stick with my pubmed workout that shows heavy singles doesn't improve muscular hypertrophy at all
A better term is to live by is; "self evident truth"
Didn't take you to be a philosopher gooby!
I agree
Being focused on train and diet is fine but focusing on stuff that actually does something is the key. Why fuck around with 8 meals and day of exactly 30g protein if its not going to make a difference.
Bro science is the bodybuilding guidelines that have no proof that they actually do anything but people repeat them off as gospel. The ones that make sense and have proof that they do something are fine.
Why waste the effort on something that's not going to give you any extra results. I would rather use my time more productively.
"bro-science" is a term used by people that have made little to no progress in their endeavours to discredit huge amounts of empirical evidence that supports a hypothesis.
There is nothing wrong with using a correlation to imply a causation and I prefer not to take chances with my gains and my PBs. Especially when it's as simple as eating more meat or making sure you eat food around the time you train. People seem to like to try and get away with the bare minimum and it's something I never understood at all. It's loss aversion at best and downright reckless at worst.
Sheiko found out that increasing volume in the first 6 years of training increased results. He didn't find the exact process behind why he just noticed a correlation and ran with it. Fucking broscientist right? I'll stick with my pubmed workout that shows heavy singles doesn't improve muscular hypertrophy at all
People will simply not try something, because they can't be fucking bothered to then instantly say it's shit to justify their laziness. "Why bother with 8 meals a day, what difference can it possibly make". Well maybe fucking try it and see if it makes a difference. If you notice a difference then go for it. If it doesn't then try something else. You need to experiment but people are afraid to for reasons that I'll never be able to fathom- then simply discredit whatever is different to them because what they do "works" for them (dunning-kruger effect)
No proof besides the basic guidlines of "bro-science" being used by most bodybuilders, athletes, strength athletes etc for the last 50-60 years and them being able to draw results from these?
I am not saying that anything is set in stone but you cant ignore the real-world results that have been drawn from "bro-science"
I understand there have been university studies etc done on 3 meals a day V 8 meals aday etc - but have these studies been based on the best athletes/bodybuilders etc in the world? Or based on the avg joe on the street trying to drop a few pounds....just think about that for a minute....to be the best you can be and/or better than others do you do the bear minimum to achieve this? or is there better ways of achieving greater results....
I understand eating 2-3 meals a day will still draw results - but will eating abit extra protein or focusing on meal timing and/or number of meals draw better results? Real-world-results seem to think it can.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?