strong enough?
Member
Let me preface this by saying I'm strongly against the use of steroids for sports performance, except where prescribed for genuine clinical reasons (eg hypogonadism). But I do believe in individual choice and I get concerned about some of the scare tactics used to cloud the debate. For example, I found this article in the Age about Gender Identity Disorder interesting: http://www.theage.com.au/national/crosssex-treatment-on-the-rise-20120520-1yyvp.html#ixzz1vStT5uff
What was interesting was how the potential effects of hormone therapy were completely played down, in the context of using drugs to halt puberty. But if the same article was about using AAS for aesthetic purposes (eg bodybuilding), I'm pretty sure the same language would not have been used. I know which is the more invasive use of the drugs.
What was interesting was how the potential effects of hormone therapy were completely played down, in the context of using drugs to halt puberty. But if the same article was about using AAS for aesthetic purposes (eg bodybuilding), I'm pretty sure the same language would not have been used. I know which is the more invasive use of the drugs.
Last edited: