Brickster, unless he's fat, the average man certainly doesn't have 16" arms
On a man of average height, a 16 inch muscular arm is very impressive—a 17 inch upper arm is so large that it may make the individual appear freakish if the rest of the body's muscular proportion is not in proportion—an 18 inch upper must be seen to be appreciated—and a 19 inch upper arm approaches the impossible insofar as size is concerned.
True—I once saw a man with upper arms that were over 20 inches in reasonable muscular condition; but he wasn't an average individual—he was just under a full nine feet tall and weighted over 250kgs!
Brickhead
Please post a picture of your upper arm with a tape measure, relaxed and cold.
below 16" you look like a noodle armed loser
16's look like your "in shape" nothing more.
Trust me I've been rocking 16's for the last couple years. Nothing impressive.
Why would I do that, when you measure tge arm its in the flexed position you twat.
When dudes talk about wanted 18's to be stacked their talking about 18" flexrd. Unflexed you'd look like that peanut in guiness world records with the synthol arms.
Don't you old ****s know anything.
below 16" you look like a noodle armed loser
16's look like your "in shape" nothing more.
Trust me I've been rocking 16's for the last couple years. Nothing impressive.
Brickster, unless he's fat, the average man certainly doesn't have 16" arms
Actually just measured my head out of curiosity coz of what you said @Silver back and my head was 23, but still don't consider arms impressive
whats your waste measurement
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?