Nice one man, good for you.
However Just becos one does not stick to a "programme" doesnt mean they dont know whats going on with the workouts.
do you not know in your head how much you can now bench, dead or squat.
Sets and reps are mentally ingraved, its just the weight that goes up.
Im not saying its better to not w/o to a programme, but I think it is better to know your body and have engraved in your mind what needs to be done in order to get where you want to be.
Frankly I think programmes are to restrictive and suck some of the fun out of the sport.
The Snout is right to stick to his compounds, as do I. But I think everything else like Bi's, tri's, Delts etc are just add-ons kinda yummy like lollies. the muscle groups are small and dont take much to be tourchered.
Guys go too far with that crap which is why you get these posers walking about with big odd shaped arms and no chest, or freakish delts and no arms.
Cos they dont understand there own bodies, for example i have slow growing delts like Branch warren, so I have to do way more to my delts then the other guy to get them to beef. Its genetics.
If I was following a programme dictating so many reps per set almost matching everything else in my programme, my delts will forever lag as a result.
I think unless your a competing builder or lifter programmes can ruin a good w/o and make you machanic instead of automatic.
Just my opinion after being on programmes for almost 6 years of lifting.
I find the programmes at first beneficial as the beginng of the programme is taylored to how much you can lift after that you can get lost in the routine and lose your way, if you dont start getting to know your true limits.
Man this is a big rant, this coffee is strong.