Drugs do equalise a lot of the 'genetic gifts' people have, so in a way they make it more fair...
Drugs do equalise a lot of the 'genetic gifts' people have, so in a way they make it more fair...
Drugs do equalise a lot of the 'genetic gifts' people have, so in a way they make it more fair...
Not really. What about those people who due to genetics respond better to drugs.
Well said, just to play devils advocate though, if you made AAS/HGH legal in sport, would sports not just then be a race to the bottom?
See who is prepared to take the most gear, trashing their kidneys & long term health and shortening their life spans for the most short term gain?
Drugs do equalise a lot of the 'genetic gifts' people have, so in a way they make it more fair...
so do we say " you can use drugs as you don't have as much genetic gift as him , or is it a sliding scale , ok you are as fast as this bloke so you can use y amount , and this bloke is the slowest of the bunch so you can us x amount
No amount of drugs can give you Usain Bolts natural stride length and frequency.
so do we say " you can use drugs as you don't have as much genetic gift as him , or is it a sliding scale , ok you are as fast as this bloke so you can use y amount , and this bloke is the slowest of the bunch so you can us x amount
And do we say dont use unless you're an athlete and then have to decide who is and who isnt one?
go back to the days where it was for the amateur athlete
if everyones on drugs they will all be in the exact same boat, those with better genetics and who train harder will win. simple as that. so letting them all take it to mae it even wont make it even, it will be the same as if everyone is clean. but they will all have better times n shit.