• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

Demystifying the 1 Rep Max

kaz

iLift
There is this belief among many trainers that the 1 rep max is something sacred and should only be performed once or twice a year. Often we’re told that it’s “too taxing” on the body to perform a 1RM. Well, I don’t buy it.

I’ve touched before on how strength is the foundation on which all other athletic qualities are built. Basically, if you get stronger everything else increases: endurance, speed, explosiveness, etc. It’s worth noting here that there is a point of diminishing returns to this but that’s only tangentially relevant to the topic at hand.

So to get stronger, it stands to reason that you need to lift heavy things. For novice and intermediate lifters you can get stronger using a much lower percentage of your maximum strength. As the lifter gets advanced, however, the threshold for strength improvement raises. In other words, if strength is your goal, training with 70% of your 1RM isn’t going to have anywhere the effect of training with >90%. Why, then, is the 1RM (and typically training at or above 95%) treated with such reverence and so rarely used? To understand, we need to delve a little deeper into the notion of a “max” and strength itself.

When training for max strength, it’s very important to realize that it is very neurologically dependent. One of the reasons beginner lifters get so strong so fast is that their bodies are “learning” to use more muscle fibers. This is also one of the reasons why, as I mentioned above, beginners can make strength gains with very lower training percentages. The increased neuromuscular efficiency allows them to utilize more of the muscle mass they have.

You see, nobody walks around utilizing 100% of their muscles. But through strength training we can develop the ability of the nervous system to voluntarily activate a higher percentage of them. This is one of the reasons why stronger lifters need to use heavier weights to continue making gains. The nervous system has adapted to recruit a much higher percentage of muscle fibers and requires a significant stimulus to continue making gains.

Based on this, we know that training maximum strength is just as much, if not more, about training the nervous system as developing the muscle tissue. Logically, from here it can be concluded that a larger muscle, with equal neurological efficiency, is stronger. For our purposes right now, though, we are concerned with the nervous system more.

*

The Max – It’s All Relative

One of the primary reasons that training with maximum weights (generally about 90% or higher) is considered “too stressful” is that many trainers interpret the term “max” to be based on what’s done at competition or in a competition like setting. This kind of thinking is counterproductive though. If you coached a football team, would you expect them to perform at every practice like it was the Super Bowl would you? Basing your training off of a competition, or even tested, max is a bit like that. The Russians knew this and found that a competition atmosphere can add up to 10% to your max. The take home point here is not to base your idea of a max off of some hyped up, stimulant and adrenaline fueled lift. That doesn’t help anybody.

The Bulgarians, on the other hand, train to a max daily. How do they do it without killing themselves? Well, one of the reasons is that they acknowledge the concept of a training max*as compared to a competition max. While competition numbers are kept in mind, a training max is anything you are able to lift on any given day with no excess physiological arousal prior to the lift. This can easily be measured by monitoring heart rate prior to the lift or looking at other arousal factors. (Zatsiorsky, 2006)

Basically, a training max is whatever you can lift without psyching yourself up, no energy drinks, stimulants or supportive gear. When you consider a max in that way, it becomes a lot less mystical.

One of the things that I have come to espouse in my training is the concept of keeping everything easy. I rarely, if ever train to failure, and for developing maximum strength I think that it’s a terrible idea. When you’re using the concept of a daily training maximum there should never be any question about whether or not you can get the lift and, as such, no reason to fail. If you are nervous, or not 100% sure you’re going to get the lift, you are outside the realm of a training max. Simple.

As mentioned above, strength training is very neurologically dependent. If you are constantly frying your CNS by failing lifts or killing yourself on a set then you aren’t going to make the best gains. Failure is counter productive for strength as it conditions the body and mind to fail. Ed Coan and Kirk Karwowski, two of the strongest men in history never missed lifts in training. (Gallagher, 2008)

*

The Boogeyman

I can hear people out there already screaming “Overtraining!” I’m not saying overtraining isn’t real, quite the contrary in fact. However, what we consider overtraining is striking similar to what is known elsewhere as “staleness”. Zatsiorsky explains staleness as being caused more by*psychological*stress than physiological, categorized by decreased vigor, increased perception of fatigue, anxiety and depression (almost identical to markers of overtraining syndrome). This is very different from the development of actual overuse injuries. In short, they are not one and the same.

So assuming overtraining is largely caused by psychological stress it’s a pretty easy jump to say that by minimizing the psychological stress you reduce the risk of overtraining. In fact, Zatsiorsky goes on to say that staleness is typically a response to utilizing a competition maximum as opposed to a training max. (Zatsiorsky, 2006) See this all tying together?

This isn’t an excuse to lift like a wimp. However, all the bravado that is usually attached to lifting is put into perspective when you examine training like this. Make it look easy and it will be easy.

*

Fear Is an Adaptation

Another problem that comes along with lifting maximum weights is fear. Anyone who tells you they don’t have a little bit of fear or nervousness when attempting a new maximum is either lying, has never lifted a max or lifts a max regularly. Fear is a conditioned response and this is another reason that the 1RM needs to be demystified.

When you train on a regular basis with near max weights you get conditioned to lifting max weights. Your body physiologically changes to prepare for max lifting and your mind psychologically changes to stop being nervous about them. This, of course, assumes you are using a good training max and minimizing the physiological arousal that normally accompanies max lifting. If you are constantly failing lifts you are going to crush your body, hurt yourself and become so terrified at the idea of attempting a max that you will never get stronger.

Not everyone needs to train like a Bulgarian weightlifter and max out 13 times a week. Obviously, as a trainer the first thing you need to do is evaluate the needs of your athlete. As I mentioned above, though, there are few people who cannot benefit from being stronger. The important thing to take away from this is to remove the 1RM and max lifting from the pedestal that it has ended up on. Get over the idea that doing a 1 rep max means you can’t lift for a month or you’ll overtrain. Remember that a training max is subjective, not objective, and isn’t anywhere near the same as a competition max.
 
Sort of off topic but on topic and I don't like creating threads for no reason.
What do most of you work with when going for a 1RM? Percentages of what you're aiming for? Eg 50% x5, 65% x3, 75% x1, 85% x1, 90% x1, 1RM attempt?

Sent from my GT-I9507 using Tapatalk
 
Only got to here
"In other words, if strength is your goal, training with 70% of your 1RM isn’t going to have anywhere the effect of training with 90%."

I disagree.

We have 2 styles of programming at my gym.

The average intensity one is always around 67-70%, the other is 72-75%.

Out of every 12 weeks, you will maybe hit 90% once, 85% weekly, sub 80% constantly.

Training with 90% plus is much more dangerous than training under - that's a given.

Knowing that's the case, if you can get as strong (or even stronger as I believe) training with sub maximal weights, why would you not?
 
Soooooooo, a 1 rep max is not a real 1 rep max set in a competition but is a 1 rep max for training which is a "training 1 rep max" as opposed to a competition 1 rep max which is a real One Rep Max which you would never do in training unless you wanted to test your real comp 1 rep max after hitting your training 1 rep max for many weeks in the hopes that training to your training 1 rep max for so long will increase your real 1 rep max which is your competition 1 rep max.

Cough.

This, in my humble opinion, is an example of an article written for the sake of writing an article, possibly to fill a regular web publishing schedule.

I feel totally mystified by the demystifying article. It's like clicking on an ad promising free high resolution porn showing amazingly hot chicks who have just had their 18th birthday that day but seem to be amazingly adept at gang bangs and anal orgasms. So you click on it (so I have heard, never done it myself…..) and your free access strangely requires a credit card.

I read the article but now I feel screwed.
 
Sort of off topic but on topic and I don't like creating threads for no reason.
What do most of you work with when going for a 1RM? Percentages of what you're aiming for? Eg 50% x5, 65% x3, 75% x1, 85% x1, 90% x1, 1RM attempt?

Sent from my GT-I9507 using Tapatalk

I am a relative weak lifter these days, but I do most of my training on 60-65%, although with just short rests.

for example, in between my 5 reps on 70kg military press and 5 reps on 72.5kg three weeks later, the heaviest I went was 47.5kg.

Now my training weight increases to 50kg for military press until next test in about three weeks.

Now if I was training for a comp, I would introduce more heavier lifting, especially as comp is closer, but this more about technique and feel rather than anything else.

Without even quantifying it before, this is how I trained when I was at my strongest. When benching 160-170kg, most of my training was on two plates.

Obviously, there are many ways to train, but that is how I train.
 
Last edited:
I am a relative weak lifter these days, but I do most of my training on 60-65%, although with just short rests.

for example, in between my 5 reps on 70kg military press and 5 reps on 72.5kg three weeks later, the heaviest I went was 47.5kg.

Now my training weight increases to 50kg for military press until next test in about three weeks.

Now if I was training for a comp, I would introduce more heavier lifting, especially as comp is closer, but this more about technique and feel rather than anything else.

Without even quantifying it before, this is how I trained when I was at my strongest. When benching 160-170kg, most of my training was on two plates.

Obviously, there are many ways to train, but that is how I train.

Sorry. Might have explained myself shit. I am talking in regards of testing your 1RM, and building warm up steps before testing it, not overall training in comparison to your 1RM

Sent from my GT-I9507 using Tapatalk
 
sorry, did not read properly.

But, like you suggest, as minimal warmup as possible.

Say going for 100kg, I would do good warmup with 40, 50, 60kgx6-8, but after that 2 reps on 70, 2 on 80, and 1 on 90kg and 95kg.

I do as little as possible, just enough to be warm and ready.
 
Only got to here
"In other words, if strength is your goal, training with 70% of your 1RM isn’t going to have anywhere the effect of training with 90%."

I disagree.

We have 2 styles of programming at my gym.

The average intensity one is always around 67-70%, the other is 72-75%.

Out of every 12 weeks, you will maybe hit 90% once, 85% weekly, sub 80% constantly.

Training with 90% plus is much more dangerous than training under - that's a given.

Knowing that's the case, if you can get as strong (or even stronger as I believe) training with sub maximal weights, why would you not?

I agree with you.

Shouldn't the total volume determine loads used? If you are doing high volume then loads need to be lower %'s of 1rm. If you are using low volume maybe like 5/3/1 then pushing to the higher %'s may be warranted.
 
I find my average intensity is roughly 80%. I creep up into the 90% range once or twice a week for maybe a double or single. 80% includes warm-ups over 50%
 
Wouldn't everyone be different. I find that I don't get much out of training with low intensity.
 
I train between 70 and 90%. Mostly 70 and 80%. Probably once or twice a week I hit 90% on one or two lifts for generally only 1 set. Often a triple.

Tim.
 
Wouldn't everyone be different. I find that I don't get much out of training with low intensity.

There will be an average
You can gain strength just fine with 70%
But I like to go heavy, I enjoy it
 
Ivan Abadjiev, the always thinking master coach of the Bulgarian weightlifters knew a thing or two about the psychology of a weightlifter. I can tell you from experience, that no other weightlifting lift would give more satisfaction to a weightlifter than the real lifts themselves. By real I mean the snatch and clean & jerk lifts. Ivan added one more that is extremely important and that was the front squat...he did away with all else. That is training heaven for an elite weightlifter. So now you've set up your weightlifters for what they crave and love most (from a psychological point of view). It would naturally follow (from a physiological point of view), that those weightlifters, whilst enjoying their stress free training, their bodies are adapting to the 95%+ of high intensity. You see, 5 reps to me when I was training was like running a marathon, hate hate hate! Give me 1 and 2 reps all day any day of the week and you've got yourself a pleased weightlifter. No supplementary exercises, no high reps, and all the tools to feed the ego (positively).

Furthermore, Abadjiev reasoned that there was no point bragging about one's brilliant technique (at the elite level of course),when one is lifting at the lower percentages of one's 1RM. That is why you see the modern (and not the 1980s Bulgarian weightlifter) lift their best lifts in competition as if that lift was 50% of their 1RM. The reason for it is the perfect adaptation of the neuromuscular system , that has that Olympic bar travelling in a finally tuned pathway.

Karen touched on the adrenaline pump of the competition. Nothing compares to that real adrenaline rush a lifter feels during the day of the competition. That feeling is not present on those training days, irrespective of what's on that bar, be it 100% or 105% of one's one rep max.

Does everyone train like the Bulgarians? No!

The journey to Rome is varied with many different routes, ...each one serves a purpose. Once you're convinced of the path you've chosen for yourself, that conviction and confidence would see you though to the finishing line. Psychology and the belief in one's abilities plays a huge part in the sport of Olympic weightlifting.



Fadi.
 
Last edited:
Top