• Keep up to date with Ausbb via Twitter and Facebook. Please add us!
  • Join the Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

    The Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Ausbb- Australian Bodybuilding Forum stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

    Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

Gay Marriage, do you support it?

Do you support Gay Marriage?

  • Total voters
    31
The Hamburgler said:
It is entirely plausible (though admittedly unlikely) that via natural selection humans have "evolved" specifically that our anus ends up being roughly the same size as a vagina.
Pre-modern birth control couples would need to abstain from sex, perform oral only or risk impregnation. Having an extra "hole" would allow couples to partake in sex without the risk of someone becoming pregnant when they didn't want to.
Using a Darwinian model individuals would be selected for mating based on the size of the anus, with individuals that had a smaller anus being less desirable and therefore less likely to spawn new generations of humans with similarly small anuses.
Click to expand...

Not only is this linguistic dynamite one of the most outstanding things I've had the pleasure of reading, it's also entirely plausible.
 
Christopher Pyne suggests gay marriage could happen 'sooner than everyone thinks'

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...ner-than-everyone-thinks-20170625-gwyco0.html


SG_729_surprise-20131129195929654704-620x349.jpg
 
Gay Marriage, do you support it?
Click to expand...
First time getting involved in this thread, because I'm finding the question being asked is the wrong question to ask (my opinion). Is the issue here about "marriage", or about a legal recognition/acceptance of a homosexual couple commitment to each other for life?


A heterosexual marriage (even though legally recognised/accepted), is no longer viewed as a necessity (even by law), for the couple to have certain rights over each other should they decide to go their separate ways some day in the future.

So based on my understanding (and I'm happy to be corrected), should not the question be more about whether one (or the law), ought to view a marriage between a homosexual couple the way it views a heterosexual's marriage, and if no, then why not?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top