What's your point?
The study suggests that lifting light weights is anything but a waste of time.
What's your point?
The study suggests that lifting light weights is anything but a waste of time.
People are inherently lazy, they pick and choose pieces of (mis)information that are in line with the amount of effort they are willing to put in - anything that falls outside that scope they dismiss as wrong.
Confirmation bias, none of us are immune to it.
People are inherently lazy, they pick and choose pieces of (mis)information that are in line with their beliefs and the amount of effort they are willing to put in - anything that falls outside that scope they dismiss as wrong.
Confirmation bias, none of us are immune to it.
If as part of your workout , lets say 5 x week you have reached a point in your ability to progress.
(you're not injured)
You feel good...
Would it be more beneficial (and note this is in the Pl section) to;
Reduce the time you spend in the gym?
Add on a couple of "light" workouts?
Reduce the number of workouts?
Add a "maintenance" workout?
Eat more?
Sleep more?
Sleep less?
Exactly- and for your information reptiles laid the first eggs, not birds
haha, you're a fucking idiot. Read the study before you post this sort of bullshit for everyone else to read as I will unequivocally mock you for it. The study was done on untrained individuals on unilateral leg extensions- of course heavy singles wouldn't work.
I think you're confusing yourself.
The subject is.
And I could be wrong.
Does lifting light as part of a heavy template throughout the week serve any purpose?
haha yeah, 6 months of cycling. Fucking elite athletes. I'm sure those high rep unilateral leg extensions turned them into beasts and I'm going to rewrite my entire training philosophy around this amazing protocol right before turning into a Chinese jet pilot. Heavy set of 3-4 reps clearly doesn't work and it's all light weight and high reps for maximum town now baby, haha